Re: Potential dig bug?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27:00AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed
> > > > that
> > > > dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound
> > > > listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries
> > > > seem to
> > > > be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with
> > > > tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops
> > > > etc
> > > > are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6.
> > > >
> > > > dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's
> > > > 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops
> > > > resolv.conf
> > > > to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with
> > > > tcpdump
> > > > that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie
> > > > Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server).
> > > >
> > > > I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link
> > > > local
> > > > IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted
> > > > talk
> > > > here and just make my point:
> > > >
> > > > $ cat resolv.conf
> > > > nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0
> > > > nameserver 2606:4700:4700::
> > > > lookup file bind
> > > > family inet6 inet4
> > > >
> > > > $ dig google.ca
> > > > [snip]
> > > > ;; Query time: 12 msec
> > > > ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::)
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls
> > > > back
> > > > to the cloudflare IPv6 server.
> > > >
> > > > I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source
> > > > IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the
> > > > 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a
> > > > link-local address.
> > > >
> > > > Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any
> > > > insight
> > > > would be appreciated.
> > > I think it is a bug and I can reproduce. Will invesigate deeper later.
> > >
> > > -Otto
> > >
> >
> > Hi Otto,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into this! I took Bodie's advice and tested nslookup and
> > host, and they both seem to have the same behaviour as dig.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Jordan
> >
>
> That is no big surprise, as they are essentially the same program
> with a different user interface, all built from the same source.
>
> -Otto
>
Fix below, further discussion on tech@
-Otto
Index: dig.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/dig/dig.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -p -r1.18 dig.c
--- dig.c 15 Sep 2020 11:47:42 - 1.18
+++ dig.c 17 Dec 2020 11:06:49 -
@@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ dash_option(char *option, char *next, di
} else
srcport = 0;
if (have_ipv6 && inet_pton(AF_INET6, value, ) == 1)
- isc_sockaddr_fromin6(_address, , srcport);
+ isc_sockaddr_fromin6(_address, , srcport, 0);
else if (have_ipv4 && inet_pton(AF_INET, value, ) == 1)
isc_sockaddr_fromin(_address, , srcport);
else
Index: dighost.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/dig/dighost.c,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -p -r1.34 dighost.c
--- dighost.c 15 Sep 2020 11:47:42 - 1.34
+++ dighost.c 17 Dec 2020 11:06:49 -
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ get_addresses(const char *hostname, in_p
struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6;
sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)tmpai->ai_addr;
isc_sockaddr_fromin6([i], >sin6_addr,
-dstport);
+dstport, sin6->sin6_scope_id);
}
i++;
@@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ parse_netprefix(struct sockaddr_storage
if (inet_pton(AF_INET6, buf, ) == 1) {
parsed = 1;
- isc_sockaddr_fromin6(sa, , 0);
+ isc_sockaddr_fromin6(sa, , 0, 0);
if (prefix_length > 128)
prefix_length = 128;
} else if (inet_pton(AF_INET, buf, ) == 1) {
Index: lib/isc/sockaddr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/dig/lib/isc/sockaddr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 sockaddr.c
--- lib/isc/sockaddr.c 28 Nov 2020 06:33:55 - 1.14
+++ lib/isc/sockaddr.c 17
Re: Potential dig bug?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27:00AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed > > > that > > > dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound > > > listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem > > > to > > > be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with > > > tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc > > > are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. > > > > > > dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's > > > 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf > > > to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump > > > that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie > > > Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). > > > > > > I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local > > > IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted > > > talk > > > here and just make my point: > > > > > > $ cat resolv.conf > > > nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 > > > nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: > > > lookup file bind > > > family inet6 inet4 > > > > > > $ dig google.ca > > > [snip] > > > ;; Query time: 12 msec > > > ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) > > > [snip] > > > > > > There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls > > > back > > > to the cloudflare IPv6 server. > > > > > > I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source > > > IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the > > > 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a > > > link-local address. > > > > > > Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight > > > would be appreciated. > > I think it is a bug and I can reproduce. Will invesigate deeper later. > > > > -Otto > > > > Hi Otto, > > Thanks for looking into this! I took Bodie's advice and tested nslookup and > host, and they both seem to have the same behaviour as dig. > > Regards, > > Jordan > That is no big surprise, as they are essentially the same program with a different user interface, all built from the same source. -Otto
Re: Potential dig bug?
On 12/16/20 11:19 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: Hi folks, I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem to be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted talk here and just make my point: $ cat resolv.conf nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: lookup file bind family inet6 inet4 $ dig google.ca [snip] ;; Query time: 12 msec ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) [snip] There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls back to the cloudflare IPv6 server. I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a link-local address. Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight would be appreciated. I think it is a bug and I can reproduce. Will invesigate deeper later. -Otto Hi Otto, Thanks for looking into this! I took Bodie's advice and tested nslookup and host, and they both seem to have the same behaviour as dig. Regards, Jordan
Re: Potential dig bug?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 02:37:19PM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that > dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound > listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem to > be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with > tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc > are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. > > dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's > 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf > to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump > that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie > Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). > > I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local > IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted talk > here and just make my point: > > $ cat resolv.conf > nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 > nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: > lookup file bind > family inet6 inet4 > > $ dig google.ca > [snip] > ;; Query time: 12 msec > ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) > [snip] > > There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls back > to the cloudflare IPv6 server. > > I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source > IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the > 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a > link-local address. > > Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight > would be appreciated. I think it is a bug and I can reproduce. Will invesigate deeper later. -Otto
Re: Potential dig bug?
On 16.12.2020 23:56, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: On 12/16/20 2:37 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: Hi folks, I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem to be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted talk here and just make my point: $ cat resolv.conf nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: lookup file bind family inet6 inet4 $ dig google.ca [snip] ;; Query time: 12 msec ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) [snip] There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls back to the cloudflare IPv6 server. I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a link-local address. Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight would be appreciated. Regards, Jordan Sorry for the double mail, I hit send too early... Woops, I failed to make the key point here: I checked with tcpdump and confirmed that dig does not even attempt to query the IPv6 link local DNS server, even though it reports a timeout - ie dig sends no traffic over the wire destined to that address: ; <<>> dig 9.10.8-P1 <<>> @fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 google.ca ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Regards, Jordan Quick idea for check..how other commands from base behave? nslookup and host namely
Re: Potential dig bug?
On 12/16/20 2:37 PM, Jordan Geoghegan wrote: Hi folks, I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem to be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted talk here and just make my point: $ cat resolv.conf nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: lookup file bind family inet6 inet4 $ dig google.ca [snip] ;; Query time: 12 msec ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) [snip] There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls back to the cloudflare IPv6 server. I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a link-local address. Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight would be appreciated. Regards, Jordan Sorry for the double mail, I hit send too early... Woops, I failed to make the key point here: I checked with tcpdump and confirmed that dig does not even attempt to query the IPv6 link local DNS server, even though it reports a timeout - ie dig sends no traffic over the wire destined to that address: ; <<>> dig 9.10.8-P1 <<>> @fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 google.ca ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Regards, Jordan
Potential dig bug?
Hi folks, I've found some surprising behaviour in the 'dig' utility. I've noticed that dig doesn't seem to support link local IPv6 addresses. I've got unbound listening on a link local IPv6 address on my router and all queries seem to be working. I'm advertising this DNS info with rad, and I confirmed with tcpdump that my devices such as iPhones, Macs, Windows, Linux desktops etc are all properly querying my unbound server over IPv6. dhclient doesn't seem to allow you to specify an IPv6 address in it's 'supersede' options, so I manually edited my OpenBSD desktops resolv.conf to specify the IPv6 unbound server first. Again, I confirmed with tcpdump that my desktop was properly querying the unbound server over IPv6 (ie Firefox, ping, ssh etc all resolved domains using this server). I used 'dig' to make a query, and I noticed it was ignoring my link local IPv6 nameserver in my resolv.conf. I'll save you guys the long form Ted talk here and just make my point: $ cat resolv.conf nameserver fe80::f29f:c2ff:fe17:b8b2%em0 nameserver 2606:4700:4700:: lookup file bind family inet6 inet4 $ dig google.ca [snip] ;; Query time: 12 msec ;; SERVER: 2606:4700:4700::#53(2606:4700:4700::) [snip] There's a bit of a delay as it waits for a time out, and then it falls back to the cloudflare IPv6 server. I tried specifying the server with '@' as well as specifying source IP/interface with '-I' to no avail. It seems dig really doesn't like the 'fe80::%em0' notation, as '@' and '-I' worked fine when used without a link-local address. Is this a bug or a feature? Am I just doing something stupid? Any insight would be appreciated. Regards, Jordan
