On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 06:14:19PM +0100, Puru Shartha wrote:
> If this is intentional, would one have to first extend the boundaries
> and then restore the disk label?
When you restore the disklabel, the partitions are restored correctly even
though they extend beyond the new boundend value.
If
Namaste Crystal,
Koti Koti Dhanyavaad for your reply.
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2023 at 3:21 PM
> From: "Crystal Kolipe"
> To: "Puru Shartha"
> Cc: "Misc"
> Subject: Re: Probable bug in disklabel(8) -R
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 a
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:02:43PM +0100, Puru Shartha wrote:
> Problem:
> The restored disk will have the boundend at 2 TB, instead of the source
> disk's full disk size boundend.
...
> The net effect may be that the restored disk has not had its boundary
> extended beyond the fdisk limit of 2
Namaste misc,
Introduction:
While using the "-R" option with disklabel(8), in a specific case, the
target disk may not match the source disk label parameters.
More precisely, the target disk's boundend may not match with the source
disk.
Overview:
A disk with storage greater than 2 TB and 512
4 matches
Mail list logo
