Thanks for your answers.
The best would be, to use the man pages if needed. For now, my main
question is answered - all other things will come from alone.
>> And -- even if you do have a system panic, very often developers can
>> make sense out of what went wrong from the output of the debugger's
On 19/10/15 23:11 Nick Holland wrote:
> ... or ...
>
> you can look at the big picture and realize...
> 1) you probably aren't a developer.
> 2) you probably haven't seen a core dump.
That's all very nice, but sometimes you don't get to pick your battles,
they come and pick you.
> and thus, I'l
On 19/10/15 23:18 Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I readed the FAQ 4.8 about partioning my drive but have a little problem
> of understanding.
>
> The machine has 32 GB physical RAM, the disc is a 256 GB SSD (yes, I know,
> I should not use swap on a SSD) and, I installed the latest sn
Thanks for your answer.
> One of the nice things about having a successful savecore(8) is that
> the captured dump can provide all the critical bits. So dumps are very
> useful to have. Tools like ps(1) and dmesg(8) have -N and -M options
> for
> post-mortem analysis.
>
> The crash(8) man page h
> Forgot about that... [ ... ]
Yep, I will do that and, keep that
> But still -- remember what developers ask for most often: a good problem
> report: panic message, trace and ps output, a dmesg and info about how
> to repeat the problem. If people would reliably provide that, they'd
> make deve
On 2015-10-20 07:55, Nick Holland wrote:
But still -- remember what developers ask for most often: a good
problem
report: panic message, trace and ps output, a dmesg and info about how
to repeat the problem. If people would reliably provide that, they'd
make developers very very happy.
Not be
On 10/20/15 07:09, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> and thus, I'll suggest you just don't worry about it. IF you manage to
>> find a way to panic your machine, drop the memory wy down to 2G or
>> so, reproduce it
Hello !
Thanks for your answer.
> Nick, In this case boot.conf:
>
> machine memory=2G
>
> would be enough? or should one get other ram sticks...?
>
> Thanks
I keep it as option. For now and till I experienced no panic, I will use
the SSD without swap. If I replace the SSD with a normal (big size
Thanks for your answer and, the detailed explanations.
> The core dumps in question here are for when the OS panics. Core dumps
> can be used by developers to look at what went wrong, but in order to do
> so, you may need everything that was in RAM at the time of the panic.
That answered my ques
Hi
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> [...]
> and thus, I'll suggest you just don't worry about it. IF you manage to
> find a way to panic your machine, drop the memory wy down to 2G or
> so, reproduce it and worry about a 2G core dump.
Nick, In this case boot.conf:
ma
Thanks for your answer.
> 2015/10/20 6:29 "Christoph R. Murauer" :
>>
>> Hello !
>>
>> I readed the FAQ 4.8 about partioning my drive but have a little problem
>> of understanding.
>>
>> The machine has 32 GB physical RAM,
>
> Wow. Way cool.
Yep.
>
>> the disc is a 256 GB SSD
>
> That's not shab
Thanks for your answer.
> On Mon, October 19, 2015 8:01 pm, Joel Rees wrote:
>>
>> I have lots of core dumps sitting around. I have not seen any the size
>> of physical memory. Nothing close. Even firefox doesn't leave that
>> much of a dump when it bombs.
>>
>> Hmm. Xombrero, from when I was play
On 10/19/15 17:18, Christoph R. Murauer wrote:
> Hello !
...
> If I follow the FAQ, then core dumps should not work. I could resize swap
> and /var to have the same (or bigger size) as the physical RAM which is
> also no problem. My question - or better the things I don't understand (I
> found no i
On Mon, October 19, 2015 8:01 pm, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> I have lots of core dumps sitting around. I have not seen any the size
> of physical memory. Nothing close. Even firefox doesn't leave that
> much of a dump when it bombs.
>
> Hmm. Xombrero, from when I was playing with that, left a coredump of
2015/10/20 6:29 "Christoph R. Murauer" :
>
> Hello !
>
> I readed the FAQ 4.8 about partioning my drive but have a little problem
> of understanding.
>
> The machine has 32 GB physical RAM,
Wow. Way cool.
> the disc is a 256 GB SSD
That's not shabby, either.
> (yes, I know,
> I should not use s
Hello !
I readed the FAQ 4.8 about partioning my drive but have a little problem
of understanding.
The machine has 32 GB physical RAM, the disc is a 256 GB SSD (yes, I know,
I should not use swap on a SSD) and, I installed the latest snapshot from
yesterday. So far so good.
Disklabel likes to cr
16 matches
Mail list logo
