Am 06/11/16 um 10:47 schrieb ML mail:
> This VM has 2 GB of RAM and 2 vCPUs and does only serve as a mail gateway,
> nothing else really. Does SpamAssassin really need so much resources?
Of course, it perl ;).
You could use something like amavis, which does additionally queueing
and invoking
So by testing empirically and change my max-childrens to 5 and this is what
actually happens:
Jun 11 09:35:45 mgw1 spamd[30100]: prefork: child states: BJun 11 09:35:45
mgw1 spamd[3024]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1]:8686 to port
783, fd 6
Jun 11 09:35:45 mgw1 spamd[30100]:
--On Friday, June 10, 2016 09:04:07 PM + ML mail
wrote:
Well right now I have max-children on 50, so you mean lowering this value
to something like 10? But then if I receive 20 simultaneous incoming SMTP
connection, what will happen to the 10 others?Will they
Would filter-pause not work for you?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 10, 2016, at 4:04 PM, ML mail wrote:
>
> Well right now I have max-children on 50, so you mean lowering this value to
something like 10? But then if I receive 20 simultaneous incoming SMTP
connection, what
Seems like the wrong solution. How about altering spamassassin's max-children
parameter instead?
Well right now I have max-children on 50, so you mean lowering this value to
something like 10? But then if I receive 20 simultaneous incoming SMTP
connection, what will happen to the 10 others?Will they fail/timeout or simply
wait?
On Friday, June 10, 2016 11:01 PM, Devin Reade
Hi,
Is it somehow possible to add a random delay of between 5-10 seconds upon a new
incomming connection to OpenSMTPD on OpenBSD?
I am asking this because I sometime have 20 mails all arriving at the same time
and then spamassassin is really slow because it spawns 20 processes and uses
all my
7 matches
Mail list logo