On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:11:51PM +0100, who one wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "> And what are you defending against?"
>
> there was/is a great guy that investigated the security of the BSDs, reported
> a few bugs too:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRg2vuwF1hY=youtu.be=1522
>
> that lead to
uary 28, 2018 at 5:15 AM
> From: mar...@martinbrandenburg.com
> To: misc@openbsd.org, whoonet...@mail.com
> Subject: Re: Removing FUSE would theoretically make a system more secure?
>
> > afaik if I would remove the lines that contains "FUSE" and "fuse" from
> > /sys/conf/GEN
> afaik if I would remove the lines that contains "FUSE" and "fuse" from
> /sys/conf/GENERIC and re-compile the kernel, that would mean, there will be
> no more FUSE support in my kernel after reboot.
>
> If so, would this step help to make my system more secure? Ex.: from a future
> FUSE
On Sat, Jan 27 2018, "who one" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> afaik if I would remove the lines that contains "FUSE" and "fuse" from
> /sys/conf/GENERIC and re-compile the kernel, that would mean, there will be
> no more FUSE support in my kernel after reboot.
>
> If so, would this
Hello,
afaik if I would remove the lines that contains "FUSE" and "fuse" from
/sys/conf/GENERIC and re-compile the kernel, that would mean, there will be no
more FUSE support in my kernel after reboot.
If so, would this step help to make my system more secure? Ex.: from a future
FUSE related
5 matches
Mail list logo