Guys,
Thanks for the quick response and advice...always helpful as usual
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:07 AM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2022-01-11, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Atticus [grobe...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> It isn't just SIP. You will need to set up NAT traversal and make sure
> RTP
> >>
On 2022-01-11, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Atticus [grobe...@gmail.com] wrote:
>> It isn't just SIP. You will need to set up NAT traversal and make sure RTP
>> traffic can pass as well. Setting up a STUN server and configuring the
>> clients to use it should aid in the NAT portion. The RTP traffic sh
Thanks to both of you for the valued information. Much appreciated.
@Atticus
This was rather short notice.I wasn't aware that they had gone ahead with
the service installation. Unfortunately in this case there's no on-site
PBX. Understandable given the current work-from-home situation. The
provide
Atticus [grobe...@gmail.com] wrote:
> It isn't just SIP. You will need to set up NAT traversal and make sure RTP
> traffic can pass as well. Setting up a STUN server and configuring the
> clients to use it should aid in the NAT portion. The RTP traffic should be
> fine as long as pf is being statef
It isn't just SIP. You will need to set up NAT traversal and make sure RTP
traffic can pass as well. Setting up a STUN server and configuring the
clients to use it should aid in the NAT portion. The RTP traffic should be
fine as long as pf is being stateful. If the phones register over SIP fine,
bu
Happy New Year to everyone!
I currently run openBSD FW v7.0 with vpn setups at a few client sites.
Fantastic...no issues.
One client recently changed office location (this week exactly) and had
Bell install a voip system using softphones. The phones worked last week.
However, now that the rest of
6 matches
Mail list logo
