Shouldn't loopback interface like hostname.lo1 show up in the bgpd fib table just like any other configured interfaces?

Hi, I am curious as to if this is really normal. I would say not, but may be I miss something, or miss understood something. All active and configured interfaces does show up in the fib table as they should and same for the standard loopback on as well as below: Loopback interface lo0 at

Re: Shouldn't loopback interface like hostname.lo1 show up in the bgpd fib table just like any other configured interfaces?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Hi, I am curious as to if this is really normal. I would say not, but may be I miss something, or miss understood something. All active and configured interfaces does show up in the fib table as they should and same for

Re: Shouldn't loopback interface like hostname.lo1 show up in the bgpd fib table just like any other configured interfaces?

Claudio Jeker wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:57:09AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Hi, I am curious as to if this is really normal. I would say not, but may be I miss something, or miss understood something. All active and configured interfaces does show up in the fib table as they

Re: Shouldn't loopback interface like hostname.lo1 show up in the bgpd fib table just like any other configured interfaces?

On 2009-01-29, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: The reason I asked is because for example I was testing configuration using loopback interface and when I reboot and I do not run bgpd I can ping the loopback interface no problem, however if I reboot and bgpd run I can still ping it,