Re: TypeO
On 10/19/18 6:29 PM, david long wrote: I'm the first to admit I don't know anything about anything. Should it be iwn or iwm for the wireless firmware drivers. Because I get an error say unable to load iwm. I thought the wireless drivers for the Intel chipset are iwn David, I would suggest reading https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html. Actually, reading the entire FAQ is a good idea for newcomers. Both iwn and iwm are wireless drivers, for different species of Intel wireless chips. Reading is a really good thing when delving into a new op system. Fortunately OpenBSD is great docs. In addition, https://undeadly.org/ is good reading, as is http://daemonforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=11 There are others but that should get you started. --STeve Andre'
Re: TypeO
I don't want to get on Theo's bad side, lol On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 6:32 PM david long wrote: > Disregard, too much beer! > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 6:29 PM david long wrote: > >> I'm the first to admit I don't know anything about anything. Should it be >> iwn or iwm for the wireless firmware drivers. Because I get an error say >> unable to load iwm. I thought the wireless drivers for the Intel chipset >> are iwn >> >
Re: TypeO
Disregard, too much beer! On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 6:29 PM david long wrote: > I'm the first to admit I don't know anything about anything. Should it be > iwn or iwm for the wireless firmware drivers. Because I get an error say > unable to load iwm. I thought the wireless drivers for the Intel chipset > are iwn >
TypeO
I'm the first to admit I don't know anything about anything. Should it be iwn or iwm for the wireless firmware drivers. Because I get an error say unable to load iwm. I thought the wireless drivers for the Intel chipset are iwn
