Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On 13 July 2012 15:16, David Coppa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that rtorrent won't run correctly, right? >>> >>> I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with >>> the switch to rthreads that it became a problem. >> >> Probably. But this also has something to do with newer >> libtorrent/rtorrent (0.13.2/0.9.2) in -current. >> 0.12.9/0.8.9 does not exhibit this problematic behavior even with >> rthreads... In fact, I'm going to back out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2. >> >>> >>> Philip Guenther >> >> ciao, >> David > > I meant: with libtorrent/rtorrent 0.13.2/0.9.2 haesbaert@'s fix does not help Can you confirm that you get an IPI storm ? with libtorrent/rtorrent 0.13.2/0.9.2 even with the fix ? I'd run it myself but I'm moving and my rtorrent machine is no more.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: >>> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that >>> rtorrent won't run correctly, right? >> >> I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with >> the switch to rthreads that it became a problem. > > Probably. But this also has something to do with newer > libtorrent/rtorrent (0.13.2/0.9.2) in -current. > 0.12.9/0.8.9 does not exhibit this problematic behavior even with > rthreads... In fact, I'm going to back out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2. > >> >> Philip Guenther > > ciao, > David I meant: with libtorrent/rtorrent 0.13.2/0.9.2 haesbaert@'s fix does not help
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: >> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that >> rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > > I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with > the switch to rthreads that it became a problem. Probably. But this also has something to do with newer libtorrent/rtorrent (0.13.2/0.9.2) in -current. 0.12.9/0.8.9 does not exhibit this problematic behavior even with rthreads... In fact, I'm going to back out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2. > > Philip Guenther ciao, David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On 13 July 2012 14:42, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > Or is there any backport? > Thanks > Can you give it a spin ? 5.1 uses uthreads still, this problem might appear more often with rthreads, I can backport it to 5.1, no problem, but I'd like to know if you the the IPI storm anyway. thanks :)
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with the switch to rthreads that it became a problem. Philip Guenther
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that > rtorrent won't run correctly, right? > Or is there any backport? Nope. 5.1 has 0.12.9/0.8.9 (and 5.2 will have the same, since I'm going to rollback from 0.13.2/0.9.2 currently in -current) ciao, David > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:31 PM, David Coppa wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> >> >> >> Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on >> >> recent -current? >> > >> > Sorry, but really missed this. >> > >> >> I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... >> > >> > This solves the problem for amd64. >> > Thank you. >> >> Btw, it seems it was a kernel problem that should now be fixed, thanks >> to haesbaert@: >> >> >> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c?r1=1.103#rev1.103 >> >> I'm going to try again with 0.13.2/0.9.2 on -current... Please do the >> same if you have time >> >> ciao, >> David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that rtorrent won't run correctly, right? Or is there any backport? Thanks On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:31 PM, David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > >> > >> Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on > >> recent -current? > > > > Sorry, but really missed this. > > > >> I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... > > > > This solves the problem for amd64. > > Thank you. > > Btw, it seems it was a kernel problem that should now be fixed, thanks > to haesbaert@: > > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c?r1=1.103#rev1.103 > > I'm going to try again with 0.13.2/0.9.2 on -current... Please do the > same if you have time > > ciao, > David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> >> Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on >> recent -current? > > Sorry, but really missed this. > >> I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... > > This solves the problem for amd64. > Thank you. Btw, it seems it was a kernel problem that should now be fixed, thanks to haesbaert@: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c?r1=1.103#rev1.103 I'm going to try again with 0.13.2/0.9.2 on -current... Please do the same if you have time ciao, David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on > recent -current? Sorry, but really missed this. > I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... This solves the problem for amd64. Thank you.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> >> Yes, this is something I've also noticed. >> No, I don't know how to patch it up. >> In other words, please be my guest and help me in trying to debug this >> problem... > > OK, will try to make some tests this weekend. > > Thank you. > Can you check if the old 0.12.9/0.8.9 exposes the same symptoms on recent -current? Just check it out with: $ cvs co -D 2012-05-02 ports/net/libtorrent ports/net/rtorrent And recompile/reinstall I'm thinking about backing out the update to 0.13.2/0.9.2... ciao, David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > Yes, this is something I've also noticed. > No, I don't know how to patch it up. > In other words, please be my guest and help me in trying to debug this > problem... OK, will try to make some tests this weekend. Thank you.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run > rtorrent + ~5 downloads. > > The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity > and 10 seconds locked. Yes, this is something I've also noticed. No, I don't know how to patch it up. In other words, please be my guest and help me in trying to debug this problem... ciao David
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:15:19PM +1000, Brett wrote: > > I don't have a solution, except to only run the amount of torrents your > machine can handle (5 or 6 is ok for my computer). Since rtorrent is normally > very lightweight it should be able to cope with a lot more than it currently > can. There is a kryptonite. If I run audio/cplay also (sndio?), the system completely freezes. > PS this thread should probably have been on ports@. Maybe, but because it probably exposes something that is system related, I thought it could be posted here. Thank you.
Re: Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
On Thu, 31 May 2012 23:47:31 -0300 Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > Hi misc@, > > Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run > rtorrent + ~5 downloads. > > The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity > and 10 seconds locked. > > Before this, had 2 complete locks, and did a cold reboot. No serial to > try something, nor a second computer atm either. > > Running top, I see that sometimes CPU for rtorrent goes to more than > 200%. Running systat, the interrupts maintain its pace, but at the > boundaries of the 10 sec locks, I can see 'ipi' going to something around > 100 (1 million). > > Didn't find what ipi means. A 'man -k' gives me ipic. > > Thoughts? > Thank you. > Before the version now in ports was committed I noticed that rtorrent would become unresponsive for 5-10 seconds when using the arrow navigation keys, see: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=133531038607123&w=2 Since reporting this, I realised that this only would happen if I had about 9-10 torrents available for seeding and/or downloading at once (it would still happen even if there was no network activity occurring). I didn't notice any undue CPU load. My overall system is fine, just rtorrent that becomes sluggish. The old version could cope with these numbers no problem. I don't have a solution, except to only run the amount of torrents your machine can handle (5 or 6 is ok for my computer). Since rtorrent is normally very lightweight it should be able to cope with a lot more than it currently can. PS this thread should probably have been on ports@.
Unresponsive -current + rtorrent
Hi misc@, Running the latest snapshot, there are some issues I'm facing when I run rtorrent + ~5 downloads. The system becomes VERY unresponsive, varying between 5 seconds of activity and 10 seconds locked. Before this, had 2 complete locks, and did a cold reboot. No serial to try something, nor a second computer atm either. Running top, I see that sometimes CPU for rtorrent goes to more than 200%. Running systat, the interrupts maintain its pace, but at the boundaries of the 10 sec locks, I can see 'ipi' going to something around 100 (1 million). Didn't find what ipi means. A 'man -k' gives me ipic. Thoughts? Thank you. OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #302: Fri May 25 19:24:55 MDT 2012 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 2110390272 (2012MB) avail mem = 2031915008 (1937MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xfc480 (33 entries) bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version "200.T02" date 10/26/2010 bios0: POSITIVO POSITIVO MOBILE acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC MCFG SLIC ECDT DBGP BOOT OEMB HPET GSCI ATKG SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB5(S3) EUSB(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) USB6(S3) USBE(S3) HDAC(S3) P0P1(S4) P0P2(S3) P0P3(S3) WLAN(S3) P0P4(S3) P0P7(S4) GLAN(S4) P0P8(S3) SLPB(S4) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500 @ 2.30GHz, 2300.43 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu0: 1MB 64b/line 4-way L2 cache cpu0: apic clock running at 200MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU T4500 @ 2.30GHz, 2300.08 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu1: 1MB 64b/line 4-way L2 cache ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpiec0 at acpi0 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz uvm_km_kmem_grow: grown to 0x8001 acpi0: unable to load \\_SB_.PCI0._INI.USBT acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (P0P1) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (P0P2) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 2 (P0P3) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 3 (P0P4) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 5 (P0P7) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C2, C1, PSS acpitz0 at acpi0acpitz0: THRM: failed to read _CRT : no critical temperature defined acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit in unknown state acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 not present acpibtn0 at acpi0: SLPB acpibtn1 at acpi0: LID_ acpivideo0 at acpi0: VGA_ acpivout0 at acpivideo0: LCDD acpivideo1 at acpi0: VGA_ cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2300 MHz: speeds: 2300, 1600, 1200 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel GM45 Host" rev 0x09 vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel GM45 Video" rev 0x09 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) intagp0 at vga1 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xd000, size 0x1000 inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 16 drm0 at inteldrm0 "Intel GM45 Video" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 16 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 17 uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 19 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 18 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 "Intel 82801I HD Audio" rev 0x03: msi azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC269, Intel/0x2802, using Realtek ALC269 audio0 at azalia0 ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 athn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR2427" rev 0x01: apic 2 int 17 athn0: AR9285 rev 2 (1T1R), ROM rev 13, address 48:5d:60:a2:e0:6a ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 "Intel 82801I PCIE" rev 0x03: msi pci4 at ppb3 bus 5 re0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Realtek 8168" rev 0x03: RTL8168D/8111D (0x2800), apic 2 int 17, address e0:69:95:a1:cb:1b rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 23 uhci4 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 19 uhci5 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 18 ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801I USB" rev 0x03: apic 2 int 23 usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1 at usb1 "Intel EHCI ro
