VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
Hi guys, (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, I'll take it off-list) Ok. It installs fine. However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right now but I can produce it if required) Is it that

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
Hi guys, (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, I'll take it off-list) Ok. It installs fine. However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right now but I can produce it if required) Is it that

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Joel Dinel
Is it that VirtualBox isn't emulating x86 hardware properly? Or, is it a bug in obsd? (I am thinking the former). Any Ideas/suggestion are entertained (Trying in VMware right now) First, get VirtualBox 3.0.8. Your version is ancient. Run it on a machine that has either Intel VT-x or AMD-V.

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
Folks, Hi. Thanks for replying. First, get VirtualBox 3.0.8. Your version is ancient. Yep I figured after posting. I will do that when I have some time(but not for some time now[see below]). Run it on a machine that has either Intel VT-x or AMD-V. Make a new vm host and make sure the VT-X or

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ishwor Gurung
[...] rig's cpu has VT-x. s/has/supports -- Regards, Ishwor Gurung

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2), .. though we do not use X on VMx. Lee

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Christiano Farina Haesbaert
2009/10/7 Ishwor Gurung ishwor.gur...@gmail.com: Hi guys, (Pardon since lot of people use *BSD and Linux together but if rude, I'll take it off-list) Ok. It installs fine. However, I keep getting segfaults on simple programs (such as xorgconfig). (I don't have exact text/dmesg to dump right

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Kay - Syllopsium
From: L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2), .. though we do not use X on VMx. Are you seriously saying

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
Is it that VirtualBox isn't emulating x86 hardware properly? Or, is it a bug in obsd? (I am thinking the former). Any Ideas/suggestion are entertained (Trying in VMware right now) Yes, Virtualbox is not emulating a PC correctly.

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 03:27 PM 10/7/2009 +0100, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: From: L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does qemu. As does VirtualBox with proper hardware support (AMD64 Socket AM2),

Re: VirtualBox2.2+OpenBSD4.4 (fail)

2009-10-07 Thread Ross Cameron
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote: At 03:27 PM 10/7/2009 +0100, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: From: L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Peter Kay - Syllopsium wrote: It's VirtualBox - looks like it's still crap. VMWare works fine, so does