On Saturday, June 9, 2018 4:34:11 PM -04 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 15:24:14 +0200
>
> > I just "fixed" anther system (this time amd64) for WEP and used again
> > fresh tarballs and it went fine. Perhaps the mirror updated or had
> > another issue.
>
> I am glad you are making
On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 15:24:14 +0200
> I just "fixed" anther system (this time amd64) for WEP and used again
> fresh tarballs and it went fine. Perhaps the mirror updated or had
> another issue.
I am glad you are making progress but I just want to be sure that you
know that WEP can be decrypted
Hi Stuart,
On 04/06/2018 22:35, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018-06-04, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
just an update, it took me a while. I had issues with the sources on
certain mirrors.
Can you provide more details please? If there are anoncvs mirrors with
bad source code that needs fixing.
On 2018-06-04, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> just an update, it took me a while. I had issues with the sources on
> certain mirrors.
Can you provide more details please? If there are anoncvs mirrors with
bad source code that needs fixing.
Hi Stefan
Stefan Sperling wrote:
I don't think it is worth the effort for us.
You are literally the only person I know of who has requested an
official backport of this fix. WEP was already broken in OpenBSD 6.2
which was released in October 2017. In all this time, nobody complained.
So it
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 04:56:19PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Is a backport possible to "stable"?
I don't think it is worth the effort for us.
You are literally the only person I know of who has requested an
official backport of this fix. WEP was already broken in OpenBSD 6.2
which was
6 matches
Mail list logo
