On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:26:38AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
AdSuck from packages/ports and whitelist mode (need some work from
start to allow JS/cookies only for pages you really want) and runs
superb
Well, I feel like an idiot. Never thought of that.
I really hate some of the crap that
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:57:42AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:26:38AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
AdSuck from packages/ports and whitelist mode (need some work from
start to allow JS/cookies only for pages you really want) and runs
superb
Well, I feel like
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:38:42AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:57:42AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:26:38AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
AdSuck from packages/ports and whitelist mode (need some work from
start to allow JS/cookies only
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
7.x.xx actual stable from Mozilla
7.x is no longer supported by Mozilla. 7.0.1 has 3 CVEs
If you don't have 8.0 on ports, go with 3.6.24
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
7.x.xx actual stable from Mozilla
7.x is no longer supported by Mozilla. 7.0.1 has 3 CVEs
If you don't have 8.0 on ports, go with 3.6.24
7.x.xx actual stable from Mozilla
7.x is no longer supported by Mozilla. 7.0.1 has 3 CVEs
If you don't have 8.0 on ports, go with 3.6.24
8.0 is in the process of being updated by nigel@, see his emails to
ports@ in last two weeks or so. Tests and feedback is welcome from
those running
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:18:13 +0100
Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
wrote:
7.x.xx actual stable from Mozilla
7.x is no longer
From: Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Which version of Firefox most secure?
To: Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 3:18 PM
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:14 PM,
Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:05 AM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Which version of Firefox most secure?
To: Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 3:18 PM
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011
In both the Packages list (for 5.0) and Ports, there are various
different versions of Firefox, such as 3.5.xx, 3.6.xx, 7.x.xx, etc.,
all seemingly separately maintained software for each of these.
Is there a version that is considered more safe/secure to use since
there are several different
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:41 AM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
In both the Packages list (for 5.0) and Ports, there are various
different versions of Firefox, such as 3.5.xx, 3.6.xx, 7.x.xx, etc.,
all seemingly separately maintained software for each of these.
Is there a version
11 matches
Mail list logo