Subject: Re: Why Linus Torvalds won't donate to OpenSSH
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD
supporters in
another huff with the Linux world... hasn't bcw(4) provided
enough
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
This was the reply I got back:
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
I suspect
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list SSH support as a feature on
their glossy brochures than shaking down other
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
Apart from the fact that was a private email from Linus to you and you
broadcast it publically (if you really did email
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller djm@ wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list SSH support as a feature on
their
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:27:55 +0930
Adam Hawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name
listed on the OpenBSD donations page
(http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html), since I figured he uses
OpenSSH.
Apart from the fact that was a private
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security thread
and covered with the same level of stability problems as GNU/Linux? One
really stops counting remote exploits for GNU/Linux very soon,
otherwise one would have to dedicate one's
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:27:48 +1000 (EST)
Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security
thread and covered with the same level of stability problems as
GNU/Linux? One really stops counting
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 03:06, Kernel Monkey wrote:
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller djm@ wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH
Nice bounce...
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at chaossolutions.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
64.233.167.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said:
: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 8:44 AM
To: Kernel Monkey
Cc: Damien Miller; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Linus Torvalds won't donate to OpenSSH
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 03:06, Kernel Monkey wrote:
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller djm@ wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email
The great thing about it is that people perusing the archives will see
the trollfest and probably not get this far to see us cluing in and
being calm and civil.
-Nick
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD supporters in
another huff with the Linux world... hasn't bcw(4) provided enough for
that purpose?
Bless you , Danno. When you're right, you're right.
13 matches
Mail list logo
