Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-15 Thread Jim Razmus
To the OP: Use Bob's prototype greyscanner. I've implemented it for two domains I host and it's wicked efficient. To address what your looking for, simply implement a valid user lookup script under Bob's greyscanner. He put a hook exactly for this: $EXTERNAL_ADDRESS_CHECKER =

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-14 Thread Bob Beck
Hi Daniel, I don't do this in spamd at the moment, because I want to keep spamd small and secure, and regex code is amazingly big and scary. have a look at my prototype greylist scanner from my nycbug talk for a way to do this. -Bob * Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-14 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Bob Beck wrote: Hi Daniel, I don't do this in spamd at the moment, because I want to keep spamd small and secure, and regex code is amazingly big and scary. have a look at my prototype greylist scanner from my nycbug talk for a way to do this. -Bob Also, I

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-14 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Bob Beck wrote: Hi Daniel, I don't do this in spamd at the moment, because I want to keep spamd small and secure, and regex code is amazingly big and scary. have a look at my prototype greylist scanner from my nycbug talk for a way to do this. -Bob Hi Bob, Your

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-11 Thread Björn Ketelaars
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:04:39 -0500, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jared r r spiegel wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit. with the not wildcard stuff, it seems like that would

Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Hi, I am trying to setup a wild card trapit for all emails getting to some domains I have to obviously reduce spam, but I don't see a way to do so. Yes you can do: spamdb -T -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] And that works well, but I would like to do something like spamdb -T -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread Hans Kremers
Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5 emails. Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking a legitimate mail server.. H.

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread Craig Skinner
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Hans Kremers wrote: Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5 emails. Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking a

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Hans Kremers wrote: Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I would like to trapit everything that is not from these 5 emails. Beware that people make mistakes. Someone could just make a typing error in one of these 5 addresses and you end up blocking a legitimate mail server.. Yes and so what.

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit. with the not wildcard stuff, it seems like that would perhaps be a bit heavier to implement than the definately is matching. grep vs. egrep, only for

Re: Wild card greytrapping setup in spamdb

2006-11-08 Thread Daniel Ouellet
jared r r spiegel wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:46:35PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: So, I see absolutely nothing wrong with this, but only huge benefit. with the not wildcard stuff, it seems like that would perhaps be a bit heavier to implement than the definately is matching. Yes