Hi,
i'm not replying to the trolls (or their off-topic rants) in this
thread, and i'm not spamming other project's lists. Instead, i'd
merely like to clarify a point that is actually on topic on this
list, to avoid that users get confused by FUD.
One of the trolls wrote:
> A gratuitous
zeur here.
> NOTHING to hold them to a promise THEY NEVER MADE.
This is what I've suspected for a long time -- the only solution appears
to be the public domain. For jurisdictions were the public domain is not
legally recognized (I've been told they exist), a workaround /may/ be to
not attach
(2) ... (I am not going to go over the legal mistakes you've made,
because of (1))...
I have not made legal mistakes, pompous programmer asshole*.
A gratuitous license, absent an attached interest, is revocable at will.
This goes for GPLv2 as used by linux, just as it goes for the BSD
(1) Wrong mailing lists - these are not linux mailing lists.
(2) ... (I am not going to go over the legal mistakes you've made,
because of (1))...
(3) Anyways, ... people do make mistakes... But, please stop making
these mistakes.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 10:55 AM wrote:
>
>
Bradley M. Kuhn: The SFConservancy's new explanation was refuted 5 hours
after it was published:
Yes they can, greg.
The GPL v2, is a bare license. It is not a contract. It lacks
consideration between the licensee and the grantor.
(IE: They didn't pay you, Greg, a thing. YOU, Greg,
5 matches
Mail list logo
