"Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In this whole discussion, I really like the following quote from a
> response to Luis' email regarding SFLC involvement...
At first blush it looks to me like the SFLC at least must have
emphasized that the originators' wishes are to be respec
On 03/09/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Gregg Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2
>
> IANAL (nor a party to this so ICBW), but AFAICS the SFLC told them to
> DTRT.
In this whole discussion, I really like the f
On 03/09/07, Gregg Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2
This is kinda old news:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118866496716802&w=2
The interesting thing, though, is to notice that:
1. Jiri, the original author of the infamous
"Gregg Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2
IANAL (nor a party to this so ICBW), but AFAICS the SFLC told them to
DTRT.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.dat
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2
5 matches
Mail list logo