Re: ath5k license revised

2007-09-03 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
"Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In this whole discussion, I really like the following quote from a > response to Luis' email regarding SFLC involvement... At first blush it looks to me like the SFLC at least must have emphasized that the originators' wishes are to be respec

Re: ath5k license revised

2007-09-03 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 03/09/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Gregg Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2 > > IANAL (nor a party to this so ICBW), but AFAICS the SFLC told them to > DTRT. In this whole discussion, I really like the f

Re: ath5k license revised

2007-09-03 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 03/09/07, Gregg Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2 This is kinda old news: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118866496716802&w=2 The interesting thing, though, is to notice that: 1. Jiri, the original author of the infamous

Re: ath5k license revised

2007-09-03 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
"Gregg Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2 IANAL (nor a party to this so ICBW), but AFAICS the SFLC told them to DTRT. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.dat

ath5k license revised

2007-09-03 Thread Gregg Reynolds
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2