Re: bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-25 Thread Florian Obser
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:48:04AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Guesses can be made, but a quick email might get a more accurate > answer :) "Hi, I see you are padding your announcements at $IX and we > are seeing you from other peers with the same path length, would you > prefer we send to

Re: bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-25, Remi Locherer wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 07:11:12AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote: >> >> *>  N 2001:db8:::/29   2001:db8::::1    100   100 >> >>

Re: bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-25 Thread Remi Locherer
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 07:11:12AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote: > >> *>  N 2001:db8:::/29   2001:db8::::1    100   100 > >> 64512 65500 i > >> *   N 2001:db8:::/29 

Re: bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote: >> *>  N 2001:db8:::/29   2001:db8::::1    100   100 64512 >> 65500 i >> *   N 2001:db8:::/29   2001:db8::::2    100   100 65500 >> 65500 i >> >> In this

bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-24 Thread Laura Smith
Hi, Let's say I've got a scenario where I've got transit ISPs and peering connections. My general config rule is that I use med to prioritise peering over transit (because localpref is too high up in the BGP selection algorithm, so localpref is a sledgehammer to crack a nut). That setup has

Re: bgpd config advice needed

2020-08-24 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote: > Hi, > > Let's say I've got a scenario where I've got transit ISPs and peering > connections. > > My general config rule is that I use med to prioritise peering over transit > (because localpref is too high up in the BGP selection