Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-11-30, ~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
~Lst wrote:
Well gentlemen...
Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in
On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:10:22 +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
...and in rc.conf(8):
It is advisable to leave the /etc/rc.conf file untouched, and instead
create and edit a new /etc/rc.conf.local file. Variables set in this
file will override variables previously set in /etc/rc.conf.
There is an
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:44:23 +1100
Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
I don't think that he decided to put it there. That is where a clean
install puts it.
Oh, i see, my bad.
Have a look at your own machine.
Not
~Lst wrote:
Well gentlemen...
Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
1. The bgpd_flags that is running via /etc/rc.conf.local
(bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock - exactly like described in
the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
~Lst wrote:
Well gentlemen...
Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
1. The bgpd_flags that is running via /etc/rc.conf.local
On 2009-11-30, ~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall alexan...@beard.se wrote:
~Lst wrote:
Well gentlemen...
Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
1. The
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:50:30 +0700
~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
*chuckle*
If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would
have to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplgsh because of the changed
root.
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:11:29 +0100, Robert wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:50:30 +0700
~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
*chuckle*
If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would
have to execute it by
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:44:23 +1100
Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
I don't think that he decided to put it there. That is where a clean
install puts it.
Oh, i see, my bad.
Have a look at your own machine.
Not there, my upgrades handle some directories differently, eg. /var/www
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
Hi,
I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Hi
Seems that you cannot connect to bgpd
Are you sure
bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
is present in your rc.conf.local?
is the socket working?
(bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show rib )
hth andre
Yes,
Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
-bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
The socket is working...
-bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory
RDE memory statistics
299643 IPv4 network entries using 6.9M of memory
599286 rib
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
didn't work too.
Did I miss the configuration ?
Let us see:
1 output of mount (the command)
2ls -l /var/www/cgi-bin
Those two might be enough.
Please reply ONLY to the list.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
-bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
The socket is working...
-bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory
RDE memory statistics
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
didn't work too.
Did I miss the configuration ?
Let us see:
1 output of mount (the command)
2ls -l
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:27:12PM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
-bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
The socket is working...
-bash-4.0# bgpctl -s
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
/sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock'
That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly
and doesn't have the OP's problem. Executing it gives a result like his
This account is currently
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:45:55 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
didn't work too.
Did I miss the configuration ?
Let
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:21:55PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
/sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock'
That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly
and doesn't have the OP's
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
Hmmm, I just remembered another setting that isn't default:
Try ls -l /var/www/bin/bgpctl
What does that show?
-bash-4.0# ls -l /var/wwwbin/bgpctl
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 55048 Jul 10 10:07 /var/www/bin/bgpctl
Rgds,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Hi
well I just did a installation of 4.6 and tried the bgplg thingy.
it took me 4 steps:
bgpd -r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
chmod 0555 /var/www/bin/bgpctl
chmod 0555 /var/www/cgi-bin/bgplg
httpd
Did you do anything else?
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
No, I just install and followed manual.
You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration
What I don't undertand, why ping, traceroute and show version is ok,
and anything else is failed (if it's via web).
Well anything else is anything
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
No, I just install and followed manual.
You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration
It might be I missed a step, Could you help where is the step that I missed ?
And if
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
No, I just install and followed manual
You either missed a step or run an very uncommon
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
No, I just install and followed
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx wrote:
Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller a...@ak.cx
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
[ snippzorz ]
Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
man 1 chroot
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
[ snippzorz ]
Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
man 1 chroot
-bash-4.0# man 1 chroot
man: no entry for chroot in section 1 of the
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
[ snippzorz ]
Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
man 1 chroot
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert bret.lamb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
[ snippzorz ]
Could
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:42:34 +0700
~Lst slack...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
I tried running bgplgsh under chroot, still works if its via CLI but
not via web.
-bash-4.0# ps -aux | grep chroot
www 4592 0.0 0.3 1356 2120 ??
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
*chuckle*
If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would have
to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplgsh because of the changed root. ;)
# man chroot
# sudo chroot -u www -g www /var/www /bin/bgplgsh
Hi,
I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=122670411001369w=2).
Everything else is not work, such as show ip bgp memory, etc...
I followed man pages and checked everything but still its
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
Hi,
I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=122670411001369w=2).
Everything else is not work, such as show ip bgp memory, etc...
I
Hi
Seems that you cannot connect to bgpd
Are you sure
bgpd_flags=-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
is present in your rc.conf.local?
is the socket working?
(bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show rib )
hth andre
Am 26.11.2009 21:06, schrieb ~Lst:
Hi,
I've already setup bgplg on my test
35 matches
Mail list logo
