If you use a snapshot you'll be very close to current and
--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
From: Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
Subject: Re: confused about updating -current
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Thursday, 29 April, 2010, 2:59
On Wed, Apr 28
On 2010-04-27 23:01:30 Alastair Johnson wrote:
if i install a system from install47.iso taken from the snapshots
folder on
a mirror i end up with a -current system eg:
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC) #636:
the docs state that you cant go from -current to -stable so my
question is -
what
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:37 -0500, Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC
AFSOC/A6OK edward.ahlsen-girard@hurlburt.af.mil wrote:
On 2010-04-27 23:01:30 Alastair Johnson wrote:
if i install a system from install47.iso taken from the snapshots
folder on
a mirror i end up with a -current
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
Nor am I, but I do that often with base installs and have not had any
major issues. There would be security concerns (especially with ports if
you're using a full blown desktop). You can follow -current if you have
the
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:08 -0600, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
Nor am I, but I do that often with base installs and have not had any
major issues. There would be security concerns (especially with ports if
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
I did not say anything about -stable. Occasionally installing snapshots
has nothing to do with -stable. Not sure why you bring it up?
Brad
I was just throwing in my two bits after everything else
that had been said.
I've written setup scripts (took a while though) for my different systems
which will never be as quick as the upgrade process but I've got it reasonably
quick and means I can keep moving forward like the openbsd project does,
switch between current, stable and snapshots without a sudden need to
--- On Wed, 28/4/10, trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk trustlevel-...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
I also found whilst the requests per second stayed the same
for 4.6 to 4.7
(web page) the throughput doubled (cpu bottlenecked).
Sorry mistyped that, it was the requests that bottlenecked the
cpu, not the
A while back on some thread, someone said that they ran -current
versions for a long while, updating ports tree for that snapshot and
could run with that particular -current as long as they liked by
adding packages as needed by building with that ports snapshot, rather
than using a later ports
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:05 -0500, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
A while back on some thread, someone said that they ran -current
versions for a long while, updating ports tree for that snapshot and
could run with that particular -current as long as they liked by
adding
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:05:06PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
A while back on some thread, someone said that they ran -current
versions for a long while, updating ports tree for that snapshot and
could run with that particular -current as long as they liked by
adding packages as needed by
if i install a system from install47.iso taken from the snapshots folder on
a mirror i end up with a -current system eg:
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC) #636:
the docs state that you cant go from -current to -stable so my question is -
what happens if i do update it?
surely thats exactly what will
if i install a system from install47.iso taken from the snapshots folder on
a mirror i end up with a -current system eg:
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC) #636:
the docs state that you cant go from -current to -stable so my question is -
what happens if i do update it?
You'll experience
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:01 +0100, Alastair Johnson
att...@googlemail.com wrote:
if i install a system from install47.iso taken from the snapshots folder
on
a mirror i end up with a -current system eg:
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC) #636:
the docs state that you cant go from -current to
14 matches
Mail list logo
