Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-04-01 Thread bytevolcano
Like, because OpenBSD is for, like, REBELS, mn! Which is like, totally gnarly dude! On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:58:00 +0200 "Max Power" wrote: > Hi guys! > Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date > of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > >

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Vivek Vinod
‎OpenBSD is based out of Canada. They run their power stations on renewable energy. This climate change is a big threat, though it worked in our favour this time. Climate change caused heavy winds, which made the wind turbines turn a bit faster, generating a lot of power.  Canadian power

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel Ouellet
On 3/31/16 4:58 AM, Max Power wrote: > Hi guys! > Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date > of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > > Thanks in advance for your reply. Because Buffy swim upstream with the salmons this year in the cold rivers of Canada and felt he

Re: date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Otto Moerbeek
Max Power schreef op 31 maart 2016 10:58:00 CEST: >Hi guys! >Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date >of the 1th November and of the 1th May? > >Thanks in advance for your reply. Because we are Time Lords? -Otto

date not respect for 5.8 and 5.9

2016-03-31 Thread Max Power
Hi guys! Why the release 5.8 and 5.9 did not comply with the canonical date of the 1th November and of the 1th May? Thanks in advance for your reply.