Hi,
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Review the lines that dmassage has commented-out. You can fairly
safely remove unused drivers for network/scsi/audio controllers/USB
devices, but other drivers/pseudo-devices are more likely to give
problems. Trimming out devices (especially some scsi and nic drivers)
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 19:28, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
If it is not broken don't fix it: fine, but it still can be made
user-friendly, e.g. by marking certain commented out devices as to
review or by not commenting them out at all if they are known or
something like that.
Or perhaps a
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 19:28, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
If it is not broken don't fix it: fine, but it still can be made
user-friendly, e.g. by marking certain commented out devices as to
review or by not commenting them out at all if they are known or
something like that.
Or perhaps a
Riccardo,
How much memory does the Omni 800 have right now?
Evan Root, CCNA
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014, at 06:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I think dmassage being unmaintained for 12 years, and this issue just
coming up
On 2013-12-25, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
prompted by the quest of a smaller kernel on my old OmniBook 800 (for
which memory modules are harder to find than a standard laptop), I tried
my luck with dmassage against a stock GENERIC 5.4 kernel conf.
I used the
On 2013-12-25, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
prompted by the quest of a smaller kernel on my old OmniBook 800 (for
which memory modules are harder to find than a standard laptop), I tried
my luck with dmassage against a stock GENERIC 5.4 kernel conf.
I used the
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014, at 06:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I think dmassage being unmaintained for 12 years, and this issue just
coming up now, probably says a lot about that type of person. It's
a type of person who can't fix dmassage, and then, sends us a mail.
Sorry, but it's the truth.
Very
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014, at 06:17 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I think dmassage being unmaintained for 12 years, and this issue just
coming up now, probably says a lot about that type of person. It's
a type of person who can't fix dmassage, and then, sends us a mail.
Sorry, but it's the truth.
Very
Hi,
Brett Mahar wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:42:24 +0100
Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
From http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why :
You will not get any support from developers
That's absolutely useful information :) One always politely asks for
help though,
What
Hi,
nobody has a clue? The only definition I could find is in mpbiosvar.h
and for sure mpbios.c uses it (malloc), this is why I enabled mpbios.
what else could it be? I also tried removing my previous build
directory, without success.
Riccardo
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:42:24 +0100
Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
| Hi,
|
| nobody has a clue? The only definition I could find is in mpbiosvar.h
| and for sure mpbios.c uses it (malloc), this is why I enabled mpbios.
|
| what else could it be? I also tried removing my
Hi,
prompted by the quest of a smaller kernel on my old OmniBook 800 (for
which memory modules are harder to find than a standard laptop), I tried
my luck with dmassage against a stock GENERIC 5.4 kernel conf.
I used the generated config fil, except that I enabled a couple of more
PCMCIA
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013, at 08:25 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
prompted by the quest of a smaller kernel on my old OmniBook 800 (for
which memory modules are harder to find than a standard laptop), I tried
my luck with dmassage against a stock GENERIC 5.4 kernel conf.
I used the
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013, at 08:25 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
prompted by the quest of a smaller kernel on my old OmniBook 800 (for
which memory modules are harder to find than a standard laptop), I tried
my luck with dmassage against a stock GENERIC 5.4 kernel conf.
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
