Re: fido library
Hi Mihai,
besides, while it is often useful to bear with newbies,
a user who is no longer a bloody beginner at using computers can
be expected to type simple commands without asking for help, e.g.
$ cd /usr/src/
$ find . -name 'Makefile*' -exec grep lfido {} \; -print
LDADD+= -lfido2 -lcbor -lusbhid
./regress/usr.bin/ssh/misc/kexfuzz/Makefile
LDADD+= -lfido2 -lcbor -lusbhid
./regress/usr.bin/ssh/unittests/Makefile.inc
LDADD+= -lfido2 -lcbor -lusbhid
./usr.bin/ssh/ssh-sk-helper/Makefile
$ man -k fido -a \( sec=1 sec=8 \)
ssh-sk-helper(8) - OpenSSH helper for FIDO authenticator support
$ man ssh-sk-helper | sed '/^D/q'
SSH-SK-HELPER(8) System Manager's ManualSSH-SK-HELPER(8)
NAME
ssh-sk-helper OpenSSH helper for FIDO authenticator support
SYNOPSIS
ssh-sk-helper [-v]
DESCRIPTION
Yours,
Ingo
Re: fido library
I am not in a bad mood. I am calling out abuse of this mailing list. So OpenBSD change ABI often during the development process. This is documented all over the place, it is one of the major things this project is known for. If each time an ABI change happens, it results in a bunch of people needing to mail about their anguish, then we have a problem. So I am telling you very clearly in very small words, and also others who might be compelled to do the same thing: GROW UP, or entirely cease using our ABI-changing-often development snapshots. then you won't need to send mails which demonstrate you don't get it. Mihai Popescu wrote: > Obviously I am not complaining. Just asked. > Obviously I found you in the bad mood. > I'm in bad mood too, but not because bad sync of snapshots. Again, just > asking. > > Thank you > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 19:33 Theo de Raadt wrote: > > You are obviously complaining about ABI mismatch between base and ports, > when using in -current snapshots. > > Let me be honest. Complaining about that is immature. It is 100% FAQ > and expected behaviour for following snapshots. People who use snapshots > are expected to accept the behaviour, and wait. > > This is not new. > > So please switch to a RELEASE, or use another operating system, or > figure your shit out. > > Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Out of curiosity, what is fido library used for since it changes _a lot_ > > breaking sync between base and ports in snapshots? > > > > Thanks >
Re: fido library
Obviously I am not complaining. Just asked. Obviously I found you in the bad mood. I'm in bad mood too, but not because bad sync of snapshots. Again, just asking. Thank you On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 19:33 Theo de Raadt wrote: > You are obviously complaining about ABI mismatch between base and ports, > when using in -current snapshots. > > Let me be honest. Complaining about that is immature. It is 100% FAQ > and expected behaviour for following snapshots. People who use snapshots > are expected to accept the behaviour, and wait. > > This is not new. > > So please switch to a RELEASE, or use another operating system, or > figure your shit out. > > > Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Out of curiosity, what is fido library used for since it changes _a lot_ > > breaking sync between base and ports in snapshots? > > > > Thanks >
Re: fido library
You are obviously complaining about ABI mismatch between base and ports, when using in -current snapshots. Let me be honest. Complaining about that is immature. It is 100% FAQ and expected behaviour for following snapshots. People who use snapshots are expected to accept the behaviour, and wait. This is not new. So please switch to a RELEASE, or use another operating system, or figure your shit out. Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > Out of curiosity, what is fido library used for since it changes _a lot_ > breaking sync between base and ports in snapshots? > > Thanks
fido library
Hello, Out of curiosity, what is fido library used for since it changes _a lot_ breaking sync between base and ports in snapshots? Thanks
