On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio
On May 8, 2006, at 6:45 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
I assumed that you would be bright enough to use Google to understand
the purpose of kio (virtual file system library). I was mistaken in
giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know
On Monday 08 May 2006 07:09, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 8, 2006, at 6:45 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 11:35, Jason Dixon wrote:
I assumed that you would be bright enough to use Google to understand
the purpose of kio (virtual file system library). I was mistaken in
giving
giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now that you know what kio is
for, does it start to make sense why it would access files in /etc
that pertain to file sharing?
It is interesting to see the leaps in your logic. I do not run samba. It
actually got installed by my mistake and
from all the mailing-list i read, misc@openbsd.org is the only one which
makes me LOL at least once a day ;)
pls keep the jokes running :)
greets, chris
ps. and to clearify it: i mean mails like the ones from dave f. and
similars *LOL
You just don't get it, do you? It doesn't matter if you're running
Samba or not. Kio will attempt to access those files which it is
Correct me if I'm being ignorant, but I don't remember seeing this
message from 3.8 or 3.9 KDE binaries that I have used (from the
CDs). Is it possible
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/security/fileshare.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch):
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:55, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde
error log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in
the kde error
log:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:31:56AM -0400, dave feustel wrote:
My guess is that it's for some GUI stuff or something...
Does this behaviour really surprise you?
Actually it does, that's why I posted the question which reflects
my (possibly naive) astonishment at some of the things I am
On 07/05/06, Ilija Liebermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found
Which window manager(s) do you recommend? I'll try it(them).
See URL:http://www.xwinman.org.
Keep in mind the applications you will be running, and whether they
need ICCCM or NetWM (EWMH) hints, or other dependencies for
certain functions the ports system may not automatically provide.
]
Sent: May 7, 2006 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: kde: kio accessing files in /etc
Which window manager(s) do you recommend? I'll try it(them).
See URL:http://www.xwinman.org.
Keep in mind the applications you will be running, and whether they
need ICCCM
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
It would be more beneficial for you and us to send patches, after
consulting with the ports mailing list, that better adapt
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
Thanks,
Dave
dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was
On 5/7/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
On 5/7/06, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Window managers such as KDE or Gnome try hard to be all things to all
people. They (and their applets/panel apps/whatever) get their
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
Google is the answer. :)
22 matches
Mail list logo
