On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 08:58:15AM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:48:00AM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
Try https://jitsi.org/ or tox https://tox.im/
Hope this helps.
thanks for the links.
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself
.
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself.
Does anyone use it? does it even work? what about deleting it?
I haven't used i386 for a year or so and i thought linux compat was still
pretty much not usable anymore :-) but when i last used it, it was just
for binary
https://tox.im/
Hope this helps.
thanks for the links.
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself.
Does anyone use it? does it even work? what about deleting it?
I haven't used i386 for a year or so and i thought linux compat was still
Try https://jitsi.org/ or tox https://tox.im/
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote:
I thought that linux emulation has partial oss audio support which
would allow to run skype on openbsd. While searching for more
information
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:48:00AM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
Try https://jitsi.org/ or tox https://tox.im/
Hope this helps.
thanks for the links.
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself.
Does anyone use it? does it even work? what about deleting it?
-- Alexandre
On Oct 31 08:58:15, a...@caoua.org wrote:
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself.
Does anyone use it? does it even work? what about deleting it?
Please.
On Oct 31 08:58:15, a...@caoua.org wrote:
The question is more about audio support in linux emulation itself.
Does anyone use it? does it even work? what about deleting it?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=119039040500478
Hi Alexandre,
I have been around for 7-8 years now even trying to play
compatiility and stuff for other programs. I would assume
you'd have to find a way to use it with OSS emulation and PulseAudio at
the same time if doing it on OpenBSD.
On 10/29/2014 02:12 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
I thought that linux emulation has partial oss audio support which
would allow
I thought that linux emulation has partial oss audio support which
would allow to run skype on openbsd. While searching for more
information, it appears that audio doesn't work in skype since at
least 7 years. See:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=119039040500478
More recent versions don't even
hmm, on Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:07:13AM +0100, frantisek holop said that
hmm, on Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:42:55PM -0800, Philip Guenther said that
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org
hmm, on Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:47:06AM +0100, frantisek holop said that
sad to say, panic'd again, seems related.
forgot to add: nice panic, because this was at shutdown..
-f
--
fact: fourteen out of every ten people like chocolate.
hmm, on Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:42:55PM -0800, Philip Guenther said that
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
...
savecore came on and i have in the logs:
Dec 28 00:25:25 amaaq
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
...
savecore came on and i have in the logs:
Dec 28 00:25:25 amaaq savecore: reboot after panic: kernel diagnostic
assertion wp-wp_new_futex ==
: No such file or directory
Dec 28 00:25:25 amaaq savecore: writing core to /var/crash/bsd.0.core
Dec 28 00:26:10 amaaq savecore: writing kernel to /var/crash/bsd.0
as the only program i run in linux emulation is opera...
thanks for all the tips how to catch this.
-f
--
i'm not nearly as think as you
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
...
i started a 'boot crash', but i am not sure
if it was finished correctly, it was sitting there
forever with the disk led on, so in the end
i just power cycled it.
It depends on how much memory you have and how fast
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:51:29AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Elmar Bschorer elmar.bschorer () bugconsulting ! de wrote:
hi list,
i tried to get skype up and running with linux emulation on openbsd 4.7.
skype starts up and i can log in but i can't see any contacts
hi list,
i tried to get skype up and running with linux emulation on openbsd 4.7.
skype starts up and i can log in but i can't see any contacts or chat
with others. looks like i am not really connected.
does anyone has skype running? any ideas what the problem might be?
tia
elmar
Elmar Bschorer elmar.bschorer () bugconsulting ! de wrote:
hi list,
i tried to get skype up and running with linux emulation on openbsd 4.7.
skype starts up and i can log in but i can't see any contacts or chat
with others. looks like i am not really connected.
does anyone has skype running? any
Have you tried it under wine?
http://wiki.winehq.org/OpenBSD
On 12 September 2010 16:51, Predrag Punosevac punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
Elmar Bschorer elmar.bschorer () bugconsulting ! de wrote:
hi list,
i tried to get skype up and running with linux emulation on openbsd 4.7.
skype starts up
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:51:29AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Elmar Bschorer elmar.bschorer () bugconsulting ! de wrote:
hi list,
i tried to get skype up and running with linux emulation on openbsd 4.7.
skype starts up and i can log in but i can't see any contacts or chat
with others
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
It is a dynamic executable and LDD in linux says it requires:
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7eac000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7feb000)
Inside the /emul/linux/ folder in
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
p.s. I tried elf2olf -o linux on the program
This helped with the static program.. it got that
L wrote:
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
I wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
When I run the program.. it says:
Abort trap
..but does not have anything stating 'core dump' is available.
How do I go about debugging this?
Now I tried KTRACE/KDUMP..
And it says..
3640 ktrace RET ktrace 0
3640 ktrace CALL
L wrote:
I'm trying to run a linux program.
ktrace ./prog
ktrace -C
kdump
28631 ktrace RET ktrace 0
28631 ktrace CALL execve(...hex crap...)
28631 ktrace NAMI ./prog
28631 ktrace NAMI /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking in
L wrote:
Just talking to myself again.. sorry..
Maybe the NAMI should be looking in /emul/linux/lib but it is trying /lib/
??
Aha.. it works if I make a folder called /lib and copy the ld-linux.so.2
library there.. so basically my question is how to get it to think the
/lib is
Hi,
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact says I should
use fedora_base for Linux emulation but compat_linux(8)
says I should use redhat_base. What is your advice?
Pieter Verberne
Pieter Verberne wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq9.html#Interact says I should
use fedora_base for Linux emulation but compat_linux(8)
says I should use redhat_base. What is your advice?
Use fedora_base, it contains much newer linux components than the
redhat_base package.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:12:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
16287 yes CALL #243 (unimplemented linux_sys_set_thread_area)()
16287 yes PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL code 0
16287 yes NAMI yes.core
What does
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:21:19AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./ekiga
./ekiga: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: cannot handle
TLS data
TLS in this context probably refers to Thread Local Storage. I don't
think it's C++ specific though.
Hi Karel,
Karel Kulhavy wrote on Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:21:19AM +0100:
Now I avoided the NTPL problem by removing the redhat base and
copying only the libraries that printed an error that it wants
them.
No comment whether this is a good or a bad idea.
In case you get lost in the Linux lib*
Hi
Now I tried to make yes work without the redhat base. I uninstalled
redhat_base, partial-redhat_base and partial-partial-redhat_base (??).
Then ldd yes on the Linux system shows these libraries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd `which yes`
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libc.so.6 =
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Hi
Now I tried to make yes work without the redhat base. I uninstalled
redhat_base, partial-redhat_base and partial-partial-redhat_base (??).
Then ldd yes on the Linux system shows these libraries:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
16287 yes CALL #243 (unimplemented linux_sys_set_thread_area)()
16287 yes PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL code 0
16287 yes NAMI yes.core
What does this mean? That linux_sys_set_thread_area is unimplemented in the
On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alex.
Hello,
I've got a fresh new 4.0/AMD64 system installed, and after sitting down
Congratulations ;)
to add Linux binary compatibility, I see that it apparently doesn't
exist on this platform. After some archive digging, it
Hello,
I've got a fresh new 4.0/AMD64 system installed, and after sitting down
to add Linux binary compatibility, I see that it apparently doesn't
exist on this platform. After some archive digging, it doesn't appear
that the idea has been thoroughly discussed, especially since adding
32-bit
I'm trying to back up an OpenBSD box using a Linux binary running under
Linux emulation. If you're really curious, the product I'm using is
EMC/Legato Networker.
The binary runs fine. The problem is that since it's running under Linux
emulation, instead of backing up /var it backs up /emul/linux
Hi Misc-folks,
The quake3 dedicated server (q3ded) fails occasionally on OpenBSD 3.9. It
relies on Linux emulation, and I am using redhat_base-8.0p8 for this. I'm
using linuxq3apoint-1.32b.x86.run.
I'm getting Received signal 11, exiting..., which seems to be a recurring
thread for quake3
Hi misc@,
I need to run flip[1], which is written in tcl/tk and only available as
binary for linux. I need it to program Atmel 8051 micro controllers.
Flip runs fine under linux emulation (after copying the included libs to
/emul/linux/lib), but I get an error message when trying to access
Ted Unangst wrote:
you can use whatever libraries you like. what's the point of a more
free distro when the only use for emulation is to run non-free
software?
or non-portable software like OpenOffice
reyk
by the way,what is the status of the openoffice native port?
On 3/3/06, Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
you can use whatever libraries you like. what's the point of a more
free distro when the only use for emulation is to run non-free
software?
or non-portable
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:32:58AM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
| Hello!
|
| On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:54:35AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
| Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
| redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
| switch
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:58:27PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Using another distribution (freely downloadable etc) will make it
easier to update the port in case of security issues after Red Hat
stopped fixing bugs in their legacy RPM's.
Not a very strong point, I agree, but a point
Hello.
Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
switch to some more free Linux distribution like Debian instead of Red
Hat to be used as the base system for Linux emulation.
Thanks in advance.
Ramiro.
Hello!
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:54:35AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
Just for curiosity, yesterday I was thinking about Linux emulation and
redhat OpenBSD packages. I would like to know if it is planned to
switch to some more free Linux distribution like Debian instead of Red
Hat to be used
Hello
In what exact way is Debian more free than Redhat with respect to the
portions OpenBSD takes for the emulation stuff?
I am not an expert in this kind of issues, I just have some curiosity.
You understand what I mean, RedHat 9 was the latest freely available
RH version. RH 9 is becoming
On 3/2/06, Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In what exact way is Debian more free than Redhat with respect to the
portions OpenBSD takes for the emulation stuff?
I am not an expert in this kind of issues, I just have some curiosity.
You understand what I mean, RedHat 9 was the latest
Hi all,
I try to run the Linux IBM Tivoli Storage Manager v5.2.2 on
OpenBSD/i386 3.8-release, with linux emulation. I use a GENERIC
kernel. I got the same result with GENERIC.MP (it's an SMP system). No
hw pb.
The goal is not to use this system in production but to evaluate the
stability
Hi all,
Refering to : http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/archive/index.php/t-29968.html,
I've tried to install the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Linux client
v5.2.2 on OpenBSD/i386 3.8 through linux emulation. It behaves
normally, but I can't backup with the '-subdir=yes' option, it
generates a core
Dear misc:
I'm attempting to use (EMC) Legato Networker to backup one of my OpenBSD
boxes. Since there's no OpenBSD binary, and Networker isn't open source, I'm
using the Linux binary uner Linux emulation. The binary executes fine, and
the OpenBSD box and Legato server are communicating perfectly
going to ask around to find out how we got it. Apparently it's not
supported but works fine.
-rick
using the Linux binary uner Linux emulation. The binary executes fine, and
the OpenBSD box and Legato server are communicating perfectly. Backups work,
but with one major problem:
Legato backs up
concerned about installing exploitable 6.0.2 on one of my
servers.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Aliwalas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:25 PM
To: Michael Favinsky
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Backups under linux emulation
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Michael
anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
properly on hardware like auich(4) stuck on 48kHz?
I've tried running the redhat esound libs against the native daemon with
no luck (sound doesn't play
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from James Wright:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
anyone have any luck getting apps running under linux emulation that
don't check whether they can play at a certain sampling rates to play
properly on hardware like auich
54 matches
Mail list logo
