On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:08:04 +0100
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> > What OpenBSD FAQ https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath
> > says for a bit different scenario applies to some extent for this
> > one as well:
> >
> > "It's worth
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 18:53:29 +0100
> Petr Ročkai wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 06:37:54PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> > > pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50%
> > > rtable 1 pass in on em0 from
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 18:53:29 +0100
Petr Ročkai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 06:37:54PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> > pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50%
> > rtable 1 pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability
> > 50% rtable 2
>
> IIUIC these two only add
On 2023-12-16, Petr Ročkai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 06:37:54PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
>> pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50% rtable 1
>> pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50% rtable 2
>
> IIUIC these two only add up to 75% probability – you
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 06:37:54PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote:
> pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50% rtable 1
> pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50% rtable 2
IIUIC these two only add up to 75% probability – you presumably want
probability 50% on the second
Normally, standard pc conf, I would suggest to browse Peter or my blog
suggestion:
20230929 15:16 ( https://bsdload.com/bsd/?blogSP=30 )
My solution taken from "Building Linux and OpenBSD Firewalls" (see Internet
Archive) to solve the no traffic prb caused by inserting the default "block in
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:25:07 - (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> See "probability" in pf.conf(5).
Thank you for the tip.
My test ruleset:
---start---
block log all
pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to
pass in on em0 from (em0:network) to probability 50% rtable 1
pass in on em0 from
On 2023-12-15, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a router whose LAN interface is in default rdomain 0, ISP1 in
> rdomain 1 and ISP2 in rdomain 2. Reason for this is a bit complicated,
> involves wireguard tunneling, I will give more details if needed.
>
> LAN hosts can access Internet over ISP1
Hi,
I have a router whose LAN interface is in default rdomain 0, ISP1 in
rdomain 1 and ISP2 in rdomain 2. Reason for this is a bit complicated,
involves wireguard tunneling, I will give more details if needed.
LAN hosts can access Internet over ISP1 by means of:
pass in on $if_lan from
9 matches
Mail list logo
