It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
understood by browsing source, there don't appear to be any man pages
describing the syscall interface, and wonder if this is an intentional
or accidental oversight.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
understood by browsing source, there don't appear to be any man pages
describing the syscall
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
understood by
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, David Higgs hig...@gmail.com wrote:
To reiterate for personal clarity, section 2 manpages for syscalls
actually refers to the corresponding libc interfaces? That makes
sense in that no userland code would be using syscalls directly due to
complications like
4 matches
Mail list logo
