Re: mutt, getmail procmail

2007-07-14 Thread Philip Guenther
On 7/13/07, Woodchuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Philip Guenther wrote: ... Why do people think that hardcoding the paths to normal programs is a good thing? Why not just say formail and let the shell do the work? Sometimes users do nutty things with aliases. Then they

Re: mutt, getmail procmail

2007-07-13 Thread Philip Guenther
On 7/13/07, Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... PATH=$HOME/bin:$HOME:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:. That line is probably unnecessary. Unless you can point to a specific program that your .procmailrc uses that is not in the default PATH set by procmail,

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: mutt, getmail procmail]

2007-07-13 Thread Denny White
Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A === Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:26:52 -0500 From: Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Philip Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mutt, getmail procmail Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mutt, getmail procmail

2007-07-13 Thread Woodchuck
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Philip Guenther wrote: On 7/13/07, Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... PATH=$HOME/bin:$HOME:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:. That line is probably unnecessary. Unless you can point to a specific program that your .procmailrc uses