Re: openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Op 29-05-15 om 20:05 schreef Theo de Raadt: Just a quick question, why is S in sensors uppercase? Is that not to confuse it with status? % ntpctl usage: ntpctl -s all | peers | Sensors | status yes... whoops, should have read a bit better. trustlevel and stratum it is.

Re: openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Op 29-05-15 om 20:05 schreef Theo de Raadt: Just a quick question, why is S in sensors uppercase? Is that not to confuse it with status? % ntpctl usage: ntpctl -s all | peers | Sensors | status yes... while on the topic. I didn't find an explanation of the header in ntpctl(8). I'm curious

Re: openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Just a quick question, why is S in sensors uppercase? Is that not to > confuse it with status? > > % ntpctl > usage: ntpctl -s all | peers | Sensors | status yes...

Re: openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread jungle Boogie
Hi Brent, On 29 May 2015 at 10:47, Brent Cook wrote: > >> On May 29, 2015, at 11:51 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> Running openntpd portable version 5.7 without HTTPS contraint, like I >> have been doing for many months now, but upon rebooting, a machine >> can't sync: > > The nt

Re: openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread Brent Cook
> On May 29, 2015, at 11:51 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > Hello All, > > Running openntpd portable version 5.7 without HTTPS contraint, like I > have been doing for many months now, but upon rebooting, a machine > can't sync: The ntpdate command is not a part of openntpd. 'ntpctl all' would sho

openntpd portable sync fails

2015-05-29 Thread jungle Boogie
Hello All, Running openntpd portable version 5.7 without HTTPS contraint, like I have been doing for many months now, but upon rebooting, a machine can't sync: % ntpdate -d hank 29 May 09:37:10 ntpdate[39781]: ntpdate 4.2.4p5-a (1) transmit(192.168.0.14) receive(192.168.0.14) transmit(192.168.0.1