openssh errata

2006-10-01 Thread nikns
http://www.openssh.com/report.html *patches and notes regarding OpenSSH* points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html Shouldn't there be seperate errata for openssh? If not, I should see there recent DoS security vulns that has been fixed in 4.4, but I don't see them there. Is there one place

Re: openssh errata

2006-10-01 Thread Martin Toft
nikns wrote: http://www.openssh.com/report.html *patches and notes regarding OpenSSH* points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html Shouldn't there be seperate errata for openssh? If not, I should see there recent DoS security vulns that has been fixed in 4.4, but I don't see them there. Is

Re: openssh errata

2006-10-01 Thread Daniel E. Hassler
Humm I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show OpenSSH_4.3 Martin Toft wrote: nikns wrote: http://www.openssh.com/report.html *patches and notes regarding OpenSSH* points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html Shouldn't there be seperate errata for

Re: openssh errata

2006-10-01 Thread Martin Toft
Daniel E. Hassler wrote: Humm I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show OpenSSH_4.3 I updated my 3.9 box from anoncvs.se.openbsd.org using 'cvs -q -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_3_9 -Pd' the 30th of September at approx 19:00 CEST (one day after you) and built kernel and

Re: openssh errata

2006-10-01 Thread Daniel E. Hassler
Ah - it's 4.4 now! Daniel E. Hassler wrote: Humm I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show OpenSSH_4.3 Martin Toft wrote: nikns wrote: http://www.openssh.com/report.html *patches and notes regarding OpenSSH* points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html