http://www.openssh.com/report.html
*patches and notes regarding OpenSSH*
points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html
Shouldn't there be seperate errata for openssh?
If not, I should see there recent DoS security
vulns that has been fixed in 4.4, but I don't see
them there.
Is there one place
nikns wrote:
http://www.openssh.com/report.html
*patches and notes regarding OpenSSH*
points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html
Shouldn't there be seperate errata for openssh?
If not, I should see there recent DoS security
vulns that has been fixed in 4.4, but I don't see
them there.
Is
Humm
I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show
OpenSSH_4.3
Martin Toft wrote:
nikns wrote:
http://www.openssh.com/report.html
*patches and notes regarding OpenSSH*
points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html
Shouldn't there be seperate errata for
Daniel E. Hassler wrote:
Humm
I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show
OpenSSH_4.3
I updated my 3.9 box from anoncvs.se.openbsd.org using 'cvs -q
-d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_3_9 -Pd' the 30th of September at approx 19:00
CEST (one day after you) and built kernel and
Ah - it's 4.4 now!
Daniel E. Hassler wrote:
Humm
I just upgraded to 3.9-STABLE on 9/29/06 and ssh/sshd still show
OpenSSH_4.3
Martin Toft wrote:
nikns wrote:
http://www.openssh.com/report.html
*patches and notes regarding OpenSSH*
points to http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html
5 matches
Mail list logo