This is current/amd64 on a Thinkpad T410 (dmesg below).
My firefox session just got killed with
UVM: pid 76017 (firefox), uid 1000 killed: out of swap
The machine has 8GB of ram and no swap.
There was a few GB of free ram at the moment.
Is there something that makes the system want
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap. However, the machine has
1G RAM, and most of it is free in the moment
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:27:35PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:27:35PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap. However, the machine has
1G RAM, and most of it is free
I ran into /etc/login.conf limits of datasize = 512M way before
hitting any other limit, so is that bumped?
that is for one process.
On Jan 07 13:27:35, h...@stare.cz wrote:
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap. However, the machine
On Jan 07 15:14:21, h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jan 07 13:27:35, h...@stare.cz wrote:
This is current/amd64. Unlike in previous versions,
some memory-heavy processes (such as in building some
big port) get killed with
UVM: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
: pid 11422 (cc1plus), uid 0 killed: out of swap
On this machine, I have _no_ swap. However, the machine has
1G RAM, and most of it is free in the moment this happens.
^^
In fact, occasionaly, spawning a new xterm fails like this,
even if there is nothing else
.18.0 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.1 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.2 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.3 (system): bad major
That's why I am bulding it from ports
(and getting the out-of-swap errors).
I don't mind
/libfreetype.so.18.2 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.3 (system): bad major
That's why I am bulding it from ports
(and getting the out-of-swap errors).
I don't mind waiting for a newer freetype or rebulding xenocara.
Right, the rebuilt xenocara (unlike the current x* sets
/libfreetype.so.18.1 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.2 (system): bad major
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.18.3 (system): bad major
That's why I am bulding it from ports
(and getting the out-of-swap errors).
I don't mind waiting for a newer freetype or rebulding xenocara.
I
On Jan 07 14:13:15, bra...@gmail.com wrote:
Would http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#Swap fix your issue?
Specifically, section 14.5.3 where you create a swap space and add it to
your swap pool?
The issue here was my ignorance of the _need_ for more RAM or swap.
It's resolved.
and procmail (all
from the latest openbsd snapshot). After letting the system sit for about
24 hours I sat down on the console to find a dozen or so out of swap
errors like this:
UVM: pid 23358 (sshd), uid 0 killed: out of swap
UVM: pid 11042 (newsyslog), uid 0 killed: out of swap
etc...
I had an ssh
14 matches
Mail list logo
