Re: pf for routers?

2010-09-25 Thread R0me0 ***
# man pf.conf - route-to The route-to option routes the packet to the specified interface with an optional address for the next hop. When a route-to rule creates state, only packets that pass in the same direction as the filter rule specifies will be

Re: pf for routers?

2010-09-25 Thread bofh
Just curious, but why not man route? On 9/22/10, Beavis pfu...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings List, I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot

Re: pf for routers?

2010-09-24 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Beavis wrote: Greetings List, I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot and most of the rules im

Re: pf for routers?

2010-09-23 Thread Martin Pelikán
2010/9/22, Beavis pfu...@gmail.com: I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot and most of the rules im seeing have something to do with NAT

pf for routers?

2010-09-22 Thread Beavis
Greetings List, I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot and most of the rules im seeing have something to do with NAT routes. any help would