On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades
properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything
new themselves (the 8bit version ones).
Have you ever tried to use screen inside a screen? ssh'd
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Martin Pelikan
martin.peli...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you ever tried to use screen inside a screen? ssh'd to other
machines? B Not to mention ^A is beginning-of-line in most terminals.
I generally map ^a to be the prefix key on tmux...
On 05/27/11 23:14, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
...
Has tmux been fixed to work on 150 MHz computers since it has
moved to libevent?
Have you stopped beating your wife and kids? [ ] yes[ ] no
Anyway... tmux seems to work just fine on a well-under 150MHz system here.
OpenBSD 4.9-current
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC) #3: Mon May 23 21:40:58 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel 486DX2 (GenuineIntel 486-class)
cpu0: FPU,V86
real mem = 66646016 (63MB)
avail mem = 54743040 (52MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27:59PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
dunno what works fine means, but today, we use a program called
tmux, which is part of base OpenBSD.
And tmux seems better written. On the Yeeloong, using
screen will send you in a kernel failure with a Trap 4
error, while using
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades
properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything
new themselves (the 8bit version ones).
If you try screen on some machines, you will crash so
On Sat, 28 May 2011, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote:
If you try screen on some machines, you will crash so badly
that even DDB inside the kernel is frozen after displaying
one or two lines of panic. At first, you wonder. Then you try
tmux, and it no longer crashes.
Never blame an
Has tmux been fixed to work on 150 MHz computers since it has
moved to libevent?
Define `fixed'. What do you consider broken?
I use tmux daily on 2-digit MHz machines, but then I don't use the
status bar because I have no use for it.
Miod
And tmux seems better written. On the Yeeloong, using
screen will send you in a kernel failure with a Trap 4
error, while using tmux you can do anything you want,
it's rock stable. screen has some shitty code inside
that overflows my fb and miod even tried to fix it
but it keeps crashing.
No program, no matter how poorly written, can crash a correctly written
kernel.
On May 28, 2011, at 4:54 AM, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades
properly. Even if it
Nick Holland wrote:
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
[Problem with screen]
[...]
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq7.html#tmux
man tmux
[...]
Thanks for all replies (also by pm), tmux indeed looks promissing.
Helmut
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty
or ssh nothing seems to happen:
screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archaic piece
of sh**, as I recall.
[helmut@OBSDHelmut ~]$ screen ls -la
[screen
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27:59PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty
or ssh nothing seems to happen:
screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archaic piece
Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades
properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything
new themselves (the 8bit version ones).
Go read the source code some time.
bye bye.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Hugo Villeneuve
harpa...@jwales.eintr.net wrote:
Has tmux been fixed to work on 150 MHz computers since it has
moved to libevent?
Has anyone reported what doesn't work?
15 matches
Mail list logo
