Re: rc.conf.local sorted?

2020-05-27 Thread Anders Andersson
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:16 AM Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > ... > > > > It looks as if the file has been sorted e.g. > > > Did you use rcctl

Re: rc.conf.local sorted?

2020-05-26 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > ... > > > It looks as if the file has been sorted e.g. > > Did you use rcctl(8) ? > > Hi Antoine, > > You are correct, that does it. I checked t

Re: rc.conf.local sorted?

2020-05-26 Thread Why 42? The lists account.
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:51:51PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > ... > > It looks as if the file has been sorted e.g. > Did you use rcctl(8) ? Hi Antoine, You are correct, that does it. I checked the history and after the upgrade I had run rcctl to enable sensorsd. Just tested it again and

Re: rc.conf.local sorted?

2020-05-25 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > Hi All, > > After running sysupgrade to update from 6.6 (snapshot) to the newest > version I noticed that the comments I added to /etc/rc.conf.local no > longer made sense (if they ever did :)). > > It looks as if th

rc.conf.local sorted?

2020-05-25 Thread Why 42? The lists account.
Hi All, After running sysupgrade to update from 6.6 (snapshot) to the newest version I noticed that the comments I added to /etc/rc.conf.local no longer made sense (if they ever did :)). It looks as if the file has been sorted e.g. > ... > # Also increase the number of -b(uffer) frames so as to