Re: relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts

2009-06-02 Thread Emery Guévremont
Original Message Subject: Re:relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts From: Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org To: Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.org CC: Pascal Lalonde plalo...@overnet.qc.ca, misc@openbsd.org Date: Wed Apr 01 2009 09:57:24 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight

Re: relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts

2009-04-01 Thread Pierre-Yves Ritschard
* Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote: Hello, I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended behavior. It's the intended behavior but I have been meaning to fix that at some point. When I

Re: relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts

2009-04-01 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:44AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote: * Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote: Hello, I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended behavior. It's the

Re: relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts

2009-04-01 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote: no, it shouldn't be fixed. one host can have different services with different states at the same time. But isn't that why you can specify an id to disable just one service on a host? The common use case for specifying a

relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts

2009-03-31 Thread Pascal Lalonde
Hello, I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended behavior. When I try to disable a host (e.g.: relayctl host disable 10.0.1.101), and that host is part of more than one table, only the first occurence