Original Message
Subject: Re:relayctl host disable doesn't loop through all hosts
From: Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org
To: Pierre-Yves Ritschard p...@spootnik.org
CC: Pascal Lalonde plalo...@overnet.qc.ca, misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wed Apr 01 2009 09:57:24 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight
* Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
behavior.
It's the intended behavior but I have been meaning to fix that at some
point.
When I
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:44AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
* Pascal Lalonde (plalo...@overnet.qc.ca) wrote:
Hello,
I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
behavior.
It's the
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote:
no, it shouldn't be fixed. one host can have different services with
different states at the same time.
But isn't that why you can specify an id to disable just one service
on a host? The common use case for specifying a
Hello,
I've been playing with relayd lately. There is a behavior which seems
unintuitive and I was wondering if that was a bug or the intended
behavior.
When I try to disable a host (e.g.: relayctl host disable 10.0.1.101),
and that host is part of more than one table, only the first occurence
5 matches
Mail list logo