* David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-05 00:59]:
Can any one comment on this ? Would it not be better to use some think
like a Cisco layer 3 GB switch.
Most el cheapo gig switches will do the job without packet loss.
you are beeing tricked by marketing terminology.
layer 3 switches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/5/07 2:01 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-05 00:59]:
Can any one comment on this ? Would it not be better to use some think
like a Cisco layer 3 GB switch.
Most el cheapo gig switches will do the job
* David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-05 17:51]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/5/07 2:01 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* David Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-05 00:59]:
Can any one comment on this ? Would it not be better to use some think
like a Cisco layer 3 GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/4/07 3:03 PM, Michael Gale wrote:
Hey,
It was suggested that we create an OpenBSD server with 9GB
interfaces to start.
I think here you mean 9 1-Gbit/s interfaces
7 Will be used right off the bat.
This would function as a core
4 matches
Mail list logo
