On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is it possible to run tftpd independant of inetd?
>>
>> No. Just run in
On 8/4/08, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is it possible to run tftpd independant of inetd?
> >
> > No. Just run inetd with a on
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible to run tftpd independant of inetd?
>
> No. Just run inetd with a one-line inetd.conf if that's all you want.
Oh. How comes?
--
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to run tftpd independant of inetd?
No. Just run inetd with a one-line inetd.conf if that's all you want.
Philip Guenther
Hi,
Is it possible to run tftpd independant of inetd?
I have tried with and without chroot but it seems to fail:
Aug 4 21:48:37 puff tftpd[15747]: getsockname: Socket operation on non-socket
(in /var/log/messages)
Works fine from inetd.
OpenBSD puff.home 4.4 GENERIC#1011 i386
--
Best Regard
5 matches
Mail list logo