Re: vgafb manpage is in wrong place, should I report it?

2018-04-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018-04-14, IL Ka wrote: > Installation process asked me if I want my X11 to be "started by xdm(1)" > and it should be rephrased to "started by display manager xenodm(1) (xdm > clone)" > since there is no xdm(1) The installer question already asks about xenodm not xdm.

Re: vgafb manpage is in wrong place, should I report it?

2018-04-14 Thread IL Ka
> When a manual page applies to more than 1 arch, we place it a level up. Thank you, but should not we add comment like the one we have for "man pci" SYNOPSIS # macppc, sparc64 vgafb* at pci? Btw, I found some more things to improve in mans like: options(4) APERTURE section should have "

Re: vgafb manpage is in wrong place, should I report it?

2018-04-14 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Hello, > I am pretty new to OpenBSD and not sure if I should report minor issue to > bugs@, but I just found that vgafb(4) device is supported only on macppc > and sparc64 (according to src/sys). It has nothing to do with i386 nor with > amd64. > > But for some reason it's man page sits directly

vgafb manpage is in wrong place, should I report it?

2018-04-13 Thread IL Ka
Hello, I am pretty new to OpenBSD and not sure if I should report minor issue to bugs@, but I just found that vgafb(4) device is supported only on macppc and sparc64 (according to src/sys). It has nothing to do with i386 nor with amd64. But for some reason it's man page sits directly in /usr/share