Re: virtual cluster with rdomain(4)

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:07:59PM +0200, Thomas Huber wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks for your input. > > And how would you do it? Just like I described. > Also putting each vport(4) in its own rdomain(4) and veb(4) takes care of > Layer2 connectivity without any pf(4) involvment? Yes. Two

Re: virtual cluster with rdomain(4)

Hi David, thanks for your input. And how would you do it? Also putting each vport(4) in its own rdomain(4) and veb(4) takes care of Layer2 connectivity without any pf(4) involvment? thanks Thomas On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 08:10, David Gwynne wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > I'd give this a go with

Re: virtual cluster with rdomain(4)

Hi Thomas, I'd give this a go with vport(4) interfaces instead of vether(4), and join them all together at layer 2 by adding them to a single veb(4). Cheers, dlg > On 10 May 2021, at 03:04, Thomas Huber wrote: > > Hi misc, > > I wanted to tinker with the cluster manager sysutils/nomad but >

virtual cluster with rdomain(4)

Hi misc, I wanted to tinker with the cluster manager sysutils/nomad but unfortunately I´ve no spare cluster for tinkering... So I had the idea of utilizing OpenBSDs outstanding possibilities for network isolation to create a virtual cluster on my VM at openbsd.amsterdam. I had different ideas