Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Toft
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:33:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: 1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess most people already know. www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection. at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself. Thanks for

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Greg Thomas
On 5/10/07, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:33:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: 1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess most people already know. www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection. at the moment it is

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Will Maier
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote: Nobody answered my second question though :) Maybe nobody knows the answer? :) Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that www.openbsd.org was the only valid site (ignoring mirror sites). Is this just bullshit?

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Emilio Perea
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote: Nobody answered my second question though :) Maybe nobody knows the answer? :) Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that www.openbsd.org was the only valid site (ignoring mirror sites). Is this just bullshit?

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 10/05/07, Emilio Perea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote: Nobody answered my second question though :) Maybe nobody knows the answer? :) Summary: I was once told not to use openbsd.org; it was said that www.openbsd.org was the only valid

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Toft
Thanks for all your answers. Sorry for creating all that fuss -- I should have interpreted Theo's answer correctly. Martin [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-09 Thread Martin Toft
Two small things: 1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess most people already know. 2. Long time ago I was told that I shouldn't use openbsd.org, as it wasn't/isn't the official site. I was told to always use the www subdomain. Maybe this was just some people

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-09 Thread Bryan
You can still get to the FAQ. I have a search box setup in FF and I was able to get to it... So the whole site ain't down, probably a permissions issue??? On 5/9/07, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two small things: 1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-09 Thread Theo de Raadt
1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess most people already know. www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection. at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself.

Re: www.openbsd.org (and vs openbsd.org)

2007-05-09 Thread Chris Smith
On 5/9/07, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. www.openbsd.org replies with Forbidden at the moment -- but I guess most people already know. www.openbsd.org is a mirror on a good network connection. at the moment it is recovering from having eaten itself. Like the snake on the new