Re: wx violations (a question)

[Stuart Henderson]

On 2016-05-31, Gregory Edigarov  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection.
> We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better
> to implement with per-exec granularity?
>
> i.e. chflags wxallowed 

We have this now, with ld -z wxneeded

wx violations (a question)

[Gregory Edigarov]

Hi,

I have a question about the implementation of W^X protection.
We now have a per filesystem knob wxallowed. but wouldn't it be better
to implement with per-exec granularity?

i.e. chflags wxallowed 

--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov