On 13/06/2014, at 14:23, Christian Pedaschus open...@matt-schwarz.com wrote:
One could have said the same about OpenSSH... or not?
That doesn't even make any sense.
What i was trying to say:
if OpenBSD does it right, then (maybe) the others will follow...
It would be totally ok if OpenSSH
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 05:59:59AM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:51:58 -0400
Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
wouldn't it be a feature?
less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure?
On 2014-06-13, Christian Pedaschus open...@matt-schwarz.com wrote:
wouldn't it be a feature?
less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure?
LibreSSL is trying to improve things for programs written against the
OpenSSL API, there are other projects who have implemented new
Christian Pedaschus open...@matt-schwarz.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:14:46 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see
people from OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking
OpenSSL and remove the
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:14:46 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see
people from OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking
OpenSSL and remove the bad code. This is past, but I see more and
more lesions
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:14:46 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see
people from OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking
OpenSSL and remove the bad code.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:51:58 -0400
Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
wouldn't it be a feature?
less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure?
What good is having a brand new from scratch API when almost nothing
uses
On 12/06/14 11:59 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:51:58 -0400
Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
wouldn't it be a feature?
less warts, less bugs, less features, less compatible, but secure?
What good is having a brand
ups, forgot to cc the list...
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:59:46 -0400
Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 12/06/14 11:59 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:51:58 -0400
Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On 12/06/14 11:43 PM, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
wouldn't it be
I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see people from
OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking OpenSSL and remove
the bad code. This is past, but I see more and more lesions are discovered.
It may be a stupid question, but having all these, isn't more efficient
I was reading stuff in misc@ about OpenSSL broken things. I see people from
OpenBSD started LibreSSL project and they are forking OpenSSL and remove
the bad code. This is past, but I see more and more lesions are discovered.
It may be a stupid question, but having all these, isn't more
11 matches
Mail list logo
