On Thu, 12 May 2016 09:01:10 -0700, Gilles Chehade
wrote:
Do test asap, the longer we lock on 5.9.2, the longer we are not doing
new OpenSMTPD work.
Forgot to ask: Will this release candidate 'play nice' with
opensmtpd-extras-201602042118?
--
You received this mail
FreeBSD 10.2 (compiled with the same flags as the -devel ports) is ok for me
# smtpctl show stats
...
scheduler.delivery.ok=3880
...
uptime=4120
--
Emmanuel Vadot
> On 12 May 2016, at 18:09, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade
On 05/12/2016 07:43 PM, Eric Faurot wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:09:20PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>>> Please test these tarballs, make sure that they build and work for you
>>>
>>> Portable version:
>>>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you probably now, we've spent tons of time sync-ing back our github
> repository to OpenBSD to end up with a single working branch there.
>
> We wanted to sync our releases with OpenBSD, however this year the May
>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:09:20PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you probably now, we've spent tons of time sync-ing back our github
> > repository to OpenBSD to end up with a single working branch there.
> >
> >
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you probably now, we've spent tons of time sync-ing back our github
> repository to OpenBSD to end up with a single working branch there.
>
> We wanted to sync our releases with OpenBSD, however this year the May
>