Re: Thoughts and queries (n=1) on the filter API

Bonjour Monsieur Gilles, > To reject a session based only on reporting events, you should subscribe > to the relevant events in order to gather the info you want, then to one > filter event to actually perform the action of rejecting. > > For example, I could subscribe to tx-connect, tx-helo and

Re: Thoughts and queries (n=1) on the filter API

Bonjour Monsieur Gilles, Merci beaucoup for your exhaustive explanations. > > 1) What is the difference between the "report" and "filter" prefixes? > > My current understanding is that "report" is oriented towards reporting > > and "filter" is oriented towards writing filters. > > > > very

Re: FCrDNS check implemented

Monsieur Gilles, > helo misc@, > > I wrote an article a few days ago: > > https://poolp.org/posts/2018-12-06/opensmtpd-proc-filters-fc-rdns/ > > > Since then, I implemented the check-fcrdns builtin filter allowing us to > filter incoming sessions that do not have a valid FCrDNS. > > How

Re: FAQ gone?

Hi Gilles, Thank you for your elaborate response. > if someone steps up to do the work, I will happily welcome the FAQ again > but it needs to be someone who commits to that work, not someone that'll > write the pages dump them once and disappear. >From what I understand, the primary

Re: FAQ gone?

Hi Gilles, > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 06:39:59PM +, mabi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering where did the FAQ section on the opensmtpd.org website > > disappear? > > > > It had useful setup examples with LMTP and Dovecot if I remember > > correctly... > > > > The FAQ was inaccurate

Re: Opensmtpd failover

Hello Craig, > > But why? Just deliver it and be done. Can't see many drawbacks in > > that. > > > > Backup MX servers don't have any mail storage, nor IMAP/POP daemon. > > They are another hop along the delivery path to the primary MX servers. > > > > Backup MX machines are not the

Re: Vacation with smtpd doesn't work in 6.4

-m...@openbsd.org +misc@opensmtpd.org [ Original mail thread - https://marc.info/?t=15422935034=1=2 ] Thank you Penty for pointing out the relevant RFC section. I was unaware of STARTTLS being optional. So I tried to understand the RFC requirement. > RFC 2487: > > A publicly-referenced

Re: smtpd new config

> > 2) If I may ask, does this new release incorporate the smtpfd filter > > redesign that you mentioned on the "Rework filters" GitHub issue [2] > > and the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation ? > > > > the next issue being 6.4 in October / November, it depends on how much > progress has been done with

Re: smtpd new config

Hi Gilles, In your blog post introducing the new config OpenSMTPD, you have mentioned that the new release will be hitting -current in a few days/weeks [1]. 1) In order to prepare for this change, it would be great if you could please share whether OpenSMTPD-Extras will work with this release?

New OpenSMTPD Snapshots

Hi Gilles, I understand that you are running the OpenSMTPD version with the new config file format, and plan to release snapshots of the same [1]. 1) Would it be possible for you to please share the possible distribution mechanism for the OpenSMTPD snapshots? Would these be available in OpenBSD