> On 2016, Feb 17, at 1:56 PM, Steve Conrad wrote:
>
> So the upshot is that it's not possible to set all mail as virtual, as can be
> done with qmail for instance.
>
>
> If the service is free, you're the
> Am 17.02.2016 um 05:12 schrieb Steve Conrad :
>
>
> Here's the config I used that broke local delivery.
> Most likely I've overlooked something simple,
>
> but it's not jumping out at me.
There is a subtle difference between a hostname
and a domain name. So you set
>This works for me. I can not say what is broken in your setup without seeing
>your config.
Here's the config I used that broke local delivery.
Most likely I've overlooked something simple,
but it's not jumping out at me.
Simply changing my hostname to pseudonymous.splazo.co
made it all
Here's the config I used that broke local delivery.
Most likely I've overlooked something simple,
but it's not jumping out at me.
Simply changing my hostname to pseudonymous.splazo.co
made it all work fine.
//Things look reasonably well configured in /etc/mail:
# cd /etc/mail
#
> On 15 Feb 2016, at 23:44, Steve Conrad wrote:
>
> I noticed a couple of minor changes that might help improve the FAQ.
>
> Setting up a virtual domain identical to the hostname will break local
> delivery even though external messages will work fine. This means you'll no