Joerg Jung @ 2016-04-05T12:58:23 +0200:
[...]
> > Indeed, this was because of the --timeout-child option to spamd(1).
> > However, raising this limit just because it might cover every message
> > size doesn't really make sense. Even with 600 secs, there will be a
> > message large enough for smtpd
> On 04 Apr 2016, at 23:27, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
>
>>> filter-spamassassin doesn't have a parameter to specify a maximum
>>> message size like spamc(1), and when it encounters a message weighing in at
>>> a
>>> few MBs, it fails, and drops back the message with a 4xx.
>>>
>>>