Re: util.c patch res_comp.c patch

2016-09-26 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
On 16-09-26 09:26:04, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > In my testing it did not, but I could be wrong. > > > > On 16-09-25 17:56:42, Eric Faurot wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:42:25PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > >

Re: util.c patch or res_comp.c patch

2016-09-26 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
On 16-09-26 09:26:04, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > In my testing it did not, but I could be wrong. > > > > On 16-09-25 17:56:42, Eric Faurot wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:42:25PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > >

Re: util.c patch

2016-09-26 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > In my testing it did not, but I could be wrong. > > On 16-09-25 17:56:42, Eric Faurot wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:42:25PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > Enforce stricter rfc helo compliance. > > > -- > > > Edgar