On May 11, 2021 8:35 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:I was pondering a message Gille Chehade commented on (https://narkive.com/2puCGKoq.4) a very long time ago.
He said:
> The cert verification happens at the transport level, not the SMTP level
> and an invalid certificate will cause TLS to abort and
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 15:45 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 5/12/21 2:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > Apparently it's a problem in glibc's inet_net_pton. It does not support
> > AF_INET6. to.c has the same problem and works around this problem by
> > handcrafting broken_inet_net_pton_ipv6().
On 5/12/21 2:56 PM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Apparently it's a problem in glibc's inet_net_pton. It does not support
AF_INET6. to.c has the same problem and works around this problem by
handcrafting broken_inet_net_pton_ipv6().
Would it be possible to use inet_pton() ?
Regards
Harri
On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 13:33 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 5/12/21 8:56 AM, nathanael wrote:
> >
> > this is what i get on my machine:
> >
> > ~ echo spf.protection.outlook.com | smtpctl spf walk
> > 40.92.0.0/15
> > 40.107.0.0/16
> > 52.100.0.0/14
> >
On 12.05.2021 14:33, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 5/12/21 8:56 AM, nathanael wrote:
this is what i get on my machine:
~ echo spf.protection.outlook.com | smtpctl spf walk
40.92.0.0/15
40.107.0.0/16
52.100.0.0/14
104.47.0.0/17
2a01:111:f400::/48
2a01:111:f403::/48
On 5/12/21 8:56 AM, nathanael wrote:
this is what i get on my machine:
~ echo spf.protection.outlook.com | smtpctl spf walk
40.92.0.0/15
40.107.0.0/16
52.100.0.0/14
104.47.0.0/17
2a01:111:f400::/48
2a01:111:f403::/48
51.4.72.0/24
On May 11, 2021 8:35 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:I was pondering a message Gille Chehade commented on (https://narkive.com/2puCGKoq.4) a very long time ago.
He said:
> The cert verification happens at the transport level, not the SMTP level
> and an invalid certificate will cause TLS to abort and
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am a big fan of IPv6, so I wonder why smtpctl spf walk omits
> all the IPv6 addresses?
>
> # echo spf.protection.outlook.com | smtpctl spf walk
> 40.92.0.0/15
> 40.107.0.0/16
> 52.100.0.0/14
> 104.47.0.0/17
>
Hi folks,
I am a big fan of IPv6, so I wonder why smtpctl spf walk omits
all the IPv6 addresses?
# echo spf.protection.outlook.com | smtpctl spf walk
40.92.0.0/15
40.107.0.0/16
52.100.0.0/14
104.47.0.0/17
51.4.72.0/24
51.5.72.0/24