Re: [PATCH] relax 553 ORCPT address syntax error (was Re: EMails to "ORCPT=rfc822;u...@example.com" are rejected)

2023-12-07 Thread Tassilo Philipp
Sorry, some unnecessary whitespace change was part of the attached patch. Find attached a cleaned up version of the patch (functionally the same). On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:34:42PM +0100, Tassilo Philipp wrote: After a direct exchange with Omar Polo about the ORCPT patch, find attached a

Re: [PATCH] relax 553 ORCPT address syntax error (was Re: EMails to "ORCPT=rfc822;u...@example.com" are rejected)

2023-12-07 Thread Tassilo Philipp
After a direct exchange with Omar Polo about the ORCPT patch, find attached a revised version of it. The changes compared to Tim's last patch are, just fyi: 1) valid_xtext() has been modified to avoid potential problems with sign extensions when using the ctype is*() functions. I also

Re: Silently reject mails

2023-12-07 Thread Tassilo Philipp
Since you mentioned "all mails" and "without creating non deliverable notices", I think it's worth pointing out that the mail server will probably send delivery status notifications for successfully delivered mails, if the sender requested it, so also look for the no-dsn option you can set on