Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 14, 2020 11:05 PM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > On 10/14/20 4:01 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > >> October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: >> >>> I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I >>> was wondering how it differs from the dedicated

Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread Demi M. Obenour
On 10/14/20 4:01 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > >> I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I >> was wondering how it differs from the dedicated high-volume MTA that >> wound up being written for the ESP. What are the

Re: How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-14 Thread gilles
October 9, 2020 1:29 AM, "Demi M. Obenour" wrote: > I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I > was wondering how it differs from the dedicated high-volume MTA that > wound up being written for the ESP. What are the features that are > needed for high volume, but

How does OpenSMTPD compare to a dedicated high-volume MTA?

2020-10-08 Thread Demi M. Obenour
I was looking at the EuroBSDCon 2017 presentation on OpenSMTPD, and I was wondering how it differs from the dedicated high-volume MTA that wound up being written for the ESP. What are the features that are needed for high volume, but otherwise don't make sense? Sincerely, Demi M. Obenour