Re: tags on the portable branch?
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 07:16:23AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > On 8/24/19 9:14 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > This is expected. > > > > Version 6.4.x only builds with LibreSSL or OpenSSL 1.0.x > > > > do you think it would be possible to set a tag matching support > for openssl 1.1.1c as well? The version I am using right now now > is based on 772da22936c8d80f7ad3284ea7e5bdbfdbee2efb, but this > might be too experimental for production use. > I'm unsure I understand what you want :-/ OpenSSL 1.1.x is only supported in the development branch so you need to track latest commit in branch 'portable': the commit you're using is one of the development branch from two weeks ago, if you are happy with that keep it, it's no less or more experimental than any commit in the branch since you're already running development code. I wouldn't know what to tag honestly -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.orgpatreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles
Re: tags on the portable branch?
Hi Gilles, On 8/24/19 9:14 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > This is expected. > > Version 6.4.x only builds with LibreSSL or OpenSSL 1.0.x > do you think it would be possible to set a tag matching support for openssl 1.1.1c as well? The version I am using right now now is based on 772da22936c8d80f7ad3284ea7e5bdbfdbee2efb, but this might be too experimental for production use. Regards Harri
Re: tags on the portable branch?
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 04:19:11PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 8/23/19 9:55 PM, John Cox wrote: > > Hi > > > > Whilst I know it doesn't help you I just git cloned that URL and the > > tag checkout just worked for me. What happens if you make another new > > (temporary) repo with clone and try again? > > > > Regards > > > > John Cox > > > > Using a new clone, as suggested: The tag "opensmtpd-6.4.2p1" is available, > but it doesn't build on Debian sid (openssl 1.1.1c). Full build.log is > attached. > This is expected. Version 6.4.x only builds with LibreSSL or OpenSSL 1.0.x See: https://poolp.org/posts/2019-07-27/july-2019-report-tons-of-smtpd-work-mostly/ -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.orgpatreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles
Re: tags on the portable branch?
On 8/23/19 9:55 PM, John Cox wrote:
> Hi
>
> Whilst I know it doesn't help you I just git cloned that URL and the
> tag checkout just worked for me. What happens if you make another new
> (temporary) repo with clone and try again?
>
> Regards
>
> John Cox
>
Using a new clone, as suggested: The tag "opensmtpd-6.4.2p1" is available,
but it doesn't build on Debian sid (openssl 1.1.1c). Full build.log is
attached.
:
:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../smtpd -I../../openbsd-compat
-I../../openbsd-compat/err_h -I../../openbsd-compat/paths_h -I. -I/usr/include
-DSMTPD_CONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DPATH_CHROOT=\"/var/empty\"
-DPATH_SMTPCTL=\"/usr/local/sbin/smtpctl\"
-DPATH_MAILLOCAL=\"/usr/local/libexec/opensmtpd/mail.local\"
-DPATH_LIBEXEC=\"/usr/local/libexec/opensmtpd\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DIO_SSL
-DCA_FILE=\"/etc/ssl/cert.pem\" -g -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess
-Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-builtin-memset
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNEED_EVENT_ASR_RUN -c -o
../../smtpd/smtpd-ca.o `test -f '../../smtpd/ca.c' || echo './'`../../smtpd/ca.c
../../smtpd/ca.c: In function 'ca_X509_verify':
../../smtpd/ca.c:204:47: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_s'}
204 |*errstr = X509_verify_cert_error_string(xsc->error);
| ^~
../../smtpd/ca.c: At top level:
../../smtpd/ca.c:307:1: error: variable 'rsae_method' has initializer but
incomplete type
307 | static RSA_METHOD rsae_method = {
| ^~
../../smtpd/ca.c:308:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
308 | "RSA privsep engine",
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:308:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:309:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
309 | rsae_pub_enc,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:309:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:310:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
310 | rsae_pub_dec,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:310:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:311:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
311 | rsae_priv_enc,
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:311:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:312:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
312 | rsae_priv_dec,
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:312:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:313:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
313 | rsae_mod_exp,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:313:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:314:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
314 | rsae_bn_mod_exp,
| ^~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:314:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:315:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
315 | rsae_init,
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:315:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:316:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
316 | rsae_finish,
| ^~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:316:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:317:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
317 | 0,
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:317:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:318:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
318 | NULL,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:318:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:319:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
319 | NULL,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:319:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:320:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
320 | NULL,
| ^~~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:320:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c:321:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
321 | rsae_keygen
| ^~~
../../smtpd/ca.c:321:2: note: (near initialization for 'rsae_method')
../../smtpd/ca.c: In function 'rsae_pub_enc':
../../smtpd/ca.c:407:21: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'RSA_METHOD' {aka 'const struct rsa_meth_st'}
407 | return (rsa_default->rsa_pub_enc(flen, from, to, rsa, padding));
| ^~
../../smtpd/ca.c: In function 'ca_engine_init':
../../smtpd/ca.c:493:38: error: invalid use of incomplete typedef 'RSA_METHOD'
{aka 'struct rsa_meth_st'}
493 | if (!ENGINE_set_name(e, rsae_method.name)) {
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:511:27: error: 'RSA_FLAG_SIGN_VER' undeclared (first use in
this function)
511 | if (rsa_default->flags & RSA_FLAG_SIGN_VER)
| ^
../../smtpd/ca.c:511:27: note: each
Re: tags on the portable branch?
Hi
>On 8/23/19 1:37 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> {hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 518} git remote -v
>> origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (fetch)
>> origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (push)
>> {hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 519} git checkout opensmtpd-6.4.2p1
>> error: pathspec 'opensmtpd-6.4.2p1' did not match any file(s) known to git
>>
>> ???
>>
>
>PS: Of course I did a "git fetch --all" first.
Whilst I know it doesn't help you I just git cloned that URL and the
tag checkout just worked for me. What happens if you make another new
(temporary) repo with clone and try again?
Regards
John Cox
Re: tags on the portable branch?
On 8/23/19 1:37 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
{hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 518} git remote -v
origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (fetch)
origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (push)
{hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 519} git checkout opensmtpd-6.4.2p1
error: pathspec 'opensmtpd-6.4.2p1' did not match any file(s) known to git
???
PS: Of course I did a "git fetch --all" first.
Re: tags on the portable branch?
On 8/22/19 10:34 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
would it be possible to set tags on the portable branch as well?
Something like
portable-6.4.1
would do.
This could help alot for creating some kind of "official" source
package for Debian and Fedora/RedHat.
you mean like this ? :-)
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/releases/tag/opensmtpd-6.4.2p1
{hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 518} git remote -v
origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (fetch)
origin https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD.git (push)
{hdunkel@dpcl082:OpenSMTPD (portable) 519} git checkout opensmtpd-6.4.2p1
error: pathspec 'opensmtpd-6.4.2p1' did not match any file(s) known to git
???
Re: tags on the portable branch?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > would it be possible to set tags on the portable branch as well? > Something like > > portable-6.4.1 > > would do. > > This could help alot for creating some kind of "official" source > package for Debian and Fedora/RedHat. > you mean like this ? :-) https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/releases/tag/opensmtpd-6.4.2p1 -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.orgpatreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles
tags on the portable branch?
Hi folks, would it be possible to set tags on the portable branch as well? Something like portable-6.4.1 would do. This could help alot for creating some kind of "official" source package for Debian and Fedora/RedHat. Thanx in advance Harri
